S&P assigned credit rating BB- to the Andijan region
Read more
UzDaily
uzdaily.uz

S&P assigned credit rating BB- to the Andijan region

S&P Global Ratings assigned long-term issuer credit ratings of BB- in both local and foreign currencies to the administration of the Andijan region on November 6, 2026. The agency noted that the outlook remains stable.

Andijan, located in the Fergana Valley in eastern Uzbekistan, benefits from strong financial performance and the absence of commercial debt. However, analysts pointed out that the rating limitations are due to the low level of regional welfare and uncertainty caused by an unstable institutional environment that limits predictability.

The stable outlook reflects a balance between a history of balanced budgets and low debt burden on one hand, and risks associated with the unstable regulatory framework governing local and regional authorities of Uzbekistan on the other. Furthermore, key budgetary decisions are made by the central government, and the influence of regions, including Andijan, on them is limited.

S&P drew attention to the frequent changes in approach to major taxes, transfers, and expenditure obligations by the central government. The last such changes occurred at the end of 2025. This undermines the stability of the region's revenue and expenditure commitments, making medium-term planning difficult.

According to analysts, debt and liquidity management practices are still in the early stages. For example, the practice of placing funds in commercial banks was only introduced in 2026, and its effectiveness has not yet been tested.

The agency characterizes the region's economy as weak by both national and international standards. GDP per capita is estimated at $2,800–$2,900, which accounts for about 64% of the national average. Nevertheless, Andijan is one of the most industrialized regions in Uzbekistan, ranking fourth in the country and accounting for 10.5% of industrial production. This is largely due to the automotive cluster around the UzAutoMotors plant in Asaka. S&P forecasts that real GDP per capita growth in 2027–2028 will average about 6.5%, consistent with the national forecast.

The agency expects the region to maintain strong budget performance. It is projected that the Andijan region will demonstrate a balanced budget or a small surplus over the next three years. According to S&P data, the region's operating income in 2025 was 6.27 trillion soums, while operating expenses reached 6.21 trillion soums, resulting in an operating balance of 62.5 billion soums. For 2026, the agency expects operating income of about 6.2 trillion soums and an operating surplus of 45.8 billion soums.

Social expenditures account for 80% of the regional budget, which limits its flexibility. S&P forecasts an increase in capital expenditures from 292 billion soums in 2026 to 650 billion soums in 2027, aligning with the region's goal of increasing infrastructure investment. These investments are expected to be financed primarily through capital transfers from the central budget.

The region's debt burden remains very low. Current legislation prohibits local and regional authorities from taking on commercial debt, and any budget deficit is covered by additional transfers from the central government. Andijan has no commercial debt, and its debt to the central budget does not exceed 1% of operating income, including transfers. Direct debt at the end of 2025 amounted to 22.5 billion soums, equivalent to 0.4% of operating income.

The sector of organizations related to regional authorities is small. The regional administration owns shares in approximately 50 companies, mainly agricultural markets. The agency found no instances of regional subsidies, capital injections, or emergency support for these companies. Districts and cities throughout the region are also financially stable thanks to support from the central government.

Regional liquidity is expected to remain sound, aided by its near debt-free status. Andijan is entitled to receive preferential budget loans to cover cash flow gaps. According to S&P, access to external financing is limited by the underdevelopment of the country's capital and banking sectors.

The agency may downgrade the rating if changes in the relationship between Andijan and the central government weaken regional support and lead to deterioration in its budget or debt position. A rating upgrade may be considered in the long term if the institutional environment for local and regional authorities significantly improves, becoming more predictable and transparent, and regions gain more influence over central government decisions. Improving the quality of financial management within Andijan is also necessary.

Similar stories

International Credit Rating of Jizzakh Region Set at BB-
Read more
uza.uz

International Credit Rating of Jizzakh Region Set at BB-

The international credit rating of the Jizzakh region has been announced. According to information presented at an open meeting in the regional administration yesterday, the region's rating is 'BB-', and the outlook is set as 'Stable.'

Fitch Ratings positively assessed the credit potential of Uzbekhydroenergo
Read more
uza.uz

Fitch Ratings positively assessed the credit potential of Uzbekhydroenergo

The financial stability of energy enterprises, their ability to meet debt obligations, and production capabilities hold an important place in international ratings.

The company Fitch Ratings conducted an assessment of the credit potential of Uzbekhydroenergo, assigning it a positive rating.

Fitch confirms BB rating for Uzbekhydroenergo and adjusts outlook to stable
Read more
uzdaily.uz

Fitch confirms BB rating for Uzbekhydroenergo and adjusts outlook to stable

The international rating agency Fitch Ratings has changed the long-term rating outlook for the issuer Uzbekhydroenergo JSC from positive to stable, while maintaining the rating itself at BB. The company's separate credit profile (SCP) remains at b+.

This outlook adjustment occurred due to changes in Fitch's methodology for assessing state-related entities. The agency will no longer automatically equate Uzbekhydroenergo's rating to Uzbekistan's sovereign rating, as it anticipates a gradual decrease in the share of debt guaranteed by the state.

Nevertheless, Fitch raised its assessment of government support from 20 to 30 points, indicating a high probability of state assistance. However, despite the significant role of government support, future changes in the company's rating are not necessarily expected to reflect changes in Uzbekistan's sovereign rating.

Uzbekhydroenergo's credit profile is constrained by the limited predictability of tariff regulation and Fitch's assessment of the operating environment in Uzbekistan. The agency notes the company's monopoly position in the country's hydropower sector, high operational profitability, business expansion, and cautious approach to debt management.

Fitch assesses the company's credit profile before considering the operating environment at bb-, whereas after this consideration, it stands at b+.

One of the key factors influencing the review is the expected change in the company's liability structure. Fitch forecasts that about 75% of Uzbekhydroenergo's debt will be backed by state guarantees between 2026 and 2028. Simultaneously, the company is increasingly attracting financing without such guarantees, which the agency views as a sign of gradual financial independence.

A larger share of unsecured borrowing could strengthen the company's financial flexibility and enhance its liquidity. Fitch also upgraded its assessment of Uzbekhydroenergo's role in implementing state policy to 'strong'. State control over the company's strategy and operations, along with its track record of receiving support, was rated as 'very strong'.

The agency also expects hydropower to play an increasingly important role in Uzbekistan's energy strategy. The development and modernization of hydroelectric power plants should increase electricity generation, strengthen energy independence, and reduce gas consumption by expanding renewable energy sources.

According to the company's investment plans, Uzbekhydroenergo's capital expenditures could average 3.7 trillion sums annually in 2027–2029 (approximately 310 million US dollars). For comparison, capital expenditures were estimated at 2.4 trillion sums per year during 2024–2026 (approximately 200 million US dollars).

Fitch expects higher investments to be accompanied by the expansion and modernization of generating capacity. The investment program is partially offset by a conservative debt management policy. The company intends to maintain the net debt to EBITDA ratio at around 3.0x and prevent it from exceeding 3.5x.

Fitch forecasts that the debt to operating cash flow (FFO) ratio will average around 3.0x in 2027–2029. The agency considers this level strong for the company's current credit profile.

Tariff policy remains another important factor. In early 2026, Uzbekistan introduced the Regulated Asset Base (RAB) methodology for energy companies. Fitch views this reform as moderately positive, as it aims to make revenue more predictable and stimulate investment. However, tariff periods are limited to one year, which complicates long-term financial planning.

The company's financial results are also dependent on settlements with other participants in the energy supply chain and its reliance on counterparty payments for electricity. The accumulation of accounts receivable previously limited its financial flexibility. In 2025, accounts receivable decreased amid lower revenue, which Fitch views as a positive development.

By the end of 2025, Uzbekhydroenergo had 1 trillion sums (approximately 80 million US dollars) in cash and equivalents, while short-term debt amounted to about 460 billion sums (approximately 38 million US dollars). The company plans to repay short-term obligations using operating cash flow.

Most of its debt consists of low-interest loans denominated in US dollars and euros, provided by domestic and foreign banks. Most of these loans are backed by state guarantees, and repayments are scheduled in stages.

Nevertheless, Fitch expects negative free cash flow in 2026–2029, partly due to potential accumulation of accounts receivable. The company is also exposed to currency risk: almost all its debt is denominated in foreign currency, while most of its revenue comes in sums. It does not use currency hedging instruments.

Among other risks identified by Fitch is asset concentration. The company's largest hydropower cascade accounts for about 40% of its installed capacity, and electricity generation volumes depend on the country's hydrological resources. These risks are partially mitigated by efficient plant operation and low marginal costs of electricity generation.

Fitch compared Uzbekhydroenergo with a number of international and local companies. The agency considers the Uzbek company's business profile somewhat weaker than that of the Turkish renewable energy producer Aydem Yenilenebilir Enerji Anonim Sirketi, which possesses higher quality assets and more predictable revenue. ENERGO-PRO a.s. benefits from a more favorable operating and regulatory environment in the markets where it operates.

Among Uzbek companies, the ratings of Thermal Power Plants JSC and Regional Electric Networks JSC align with the country's sovereign rating, reflecting their significant dependence on state funding and guarantees. A similar approach is applied to Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex JSC, given the very high probability of state support. The rating of Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Company JSC is constrained by Uzbekistan's sovereign rating.

In its base case scenario, Fitch projects that Uzbekistan's GDP will grow by an average of 6.3% annually from 2026 to 2029, the average USD exchange rate will be around 12,600 sums, and Uzbekhydroenergo's annual electricity generation will reach 8.6 TWh.

The agency also assumes that effective tariffs will increase by 7% in 2027 and then be indexed to inflation starting in 2028. Other assumptions include average annual capital expenditures of about 3.3 trillion sums and minimal dividend payments.

A downgrade could occur if Uzbekistan's sovereign rating deteriorates, if the company's ties with the state weaken significantly, or if operational performance declines. Other risks include an overly ambitious investment program, an increase in accounts receivable, or dividend payments that would keep the debt to FFO ratio above 5.0x.

A rating upgrade could be supported by strengthening ties with the government, improving the operating environment, and greater predictability in tariff regulation. Specifically, the introduction of multi-year tariff planning combined with a stronger financial profile and a sustained reduction in the debt to FFO ratio below 3.0x could improve the company's credit rating.

Uzbekhydroenergo operates about 50 hydroelectric power plants across Uzbekistan, as well as micro-hydro power plants. Its installed capacity is 2.4 GW, accounting for approximately 10% of the country's total electricity generation. The ultimate owner of the company is the Government of Uzbekistan.

According to Fitch, climate factors do not indicate increased risk for the company. Environmental, social responsibility, and corporate governance (ESG) factors received a significance score of 3, corresponding to a neutral or minimal impact on the issuer's creditworthiness.

Popular