Meta suspends implementation of new terms of service following international pressure
Read more
Olhar Digital
olhardigital.com.br

Meta suspends implementation of new terms of service following international pressure

Meta has indefinitely paused the application of new commercial terms of service that would allow the company to collect content from websites belonging to users' business accounts. This decision was announced on Thursday, the 5th, after weeks of intense pressure from media outlets, regulatory bodies, and editorial sector representatives.

The company itself confirmed this change to the Nieman Lab. A company spokesperson stated in a release that the decision was to halt the modifications while dialogue with the involved parties continues.

Furthermore, Meta removed the page displaying a summary of the new guidelines from the internet and posted an update in its business help center. According to the statement, changes related to Commercial Terms, Product Catalog Terms, Self-Service Advertising Terms, and Generative AI Terms for Ad Creation have been suspended and will not be implemented on the scheduled date of November 20th.

While negotiations continue, the current terms remain valid, and the company has not yet set a new date for introducing these changes. Initially, the new conditions were scheduled to take effect on October 30th but were postponed to November 20th due to negative reaction.

On October 28th, Meta's VP of Communications, Andy Stone, had informed that the company planned to consult publishers and industry representatives before activating the rules. He also admitted that conversations might exceed the initial deadline, which would imply another postponement. However, the company has now opted to suspend the changes indefinitely.

Opposition to the new commercial conditions was not limited to the United States. Courts in both Norway and Brazil issued preliminary injunctions to block the entry into force of the terms, resulting from lawsuits filed by media organizations in these two countries.

In the United Kingdom, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) launched a formal investigation to verify whether Meta was exploiting its dominant position by imposing conditions considered predatory on advertisers and publishers.

In the United States, the proposal also generated questions from parliamentarians of both major parties. At the end of October, Senators Adam Schiff of the Democratic party from California and Marsha Blackburn of the Republican party from Tennessee sent correspondence to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg requesting the revocation of the new terms.

This suspension announced this week marks a significant shift in the conflict between the corporation and editorial sector representatives. However, it remains uncertain whether Meta will present a revised version of the commercial terms or permanently abandon the proposal.

Similar stories

MINDS International rejects Meta's commercial terms, defending copyright
Read more
noticiasaominuto.com

MINDS International rejects Meta's commercial terms, defending copyright

MINDS International, an international network that aggregates major global news agencies, has strongly rejected the recently presented commercial terms from Meta, insisting on the necessity of respecting copyrights.

In an official statement, MINDS International declared that Meta's revised terms are inadmissible because there is a significant risk of granting the company broad rights over journalistic material without explicit consent, proper licensing, or fair financial compensation.

The network argues that such conditions are unsustainable for the media sector and must be removed or undergo a thorough reassessment. News agencies and media entities invest considerable resources in producing, verifying, and collecting reliable news.

According to MINDS International, the generated content constitutes protected intellectual property and should not be treated as free material for lucrative exploitation by technology companies. The entity warns that allowing platforms to use journalistic content without clear authorizations and adequate remuneration harms copyrights, threatens the economic viability of independent journalism, and weakens media pluralism.

The criticism extends to the market power of a tech giant demanding rights over content it neither produced nor compensated for. MINDS International emphasizes that news agencies cannot give up their intellectual property just to maintain access to platforms that have become vital channels for reaching the public.

Wolfgang Nedomansky, Executive Director of MINDS International, and Tina Mari Flem, Chairman of the MINDS Board, emphasized that no platform should have the power to impose conditions that diminish copyrights and the economic foundations of autonomous journalism, calling on world governments and regulatory bodies to intervene to protect the rights of media organizations.

Additionally, the European Alliance of News Agencies (EANA) joined editors, television broadcasters, and other media associations to request that Meta remove the clause allowing the tracking and collection of journalistic content from its websites. Concurrently, the World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA) sent correspondence to Meta, requesting the suspension, until October 30, of the provision that would allow the monitoring and collection of journalistic materials from communication portals.

Popular