How US midterm election results could affect global oil prices below $100
Read more
Khaleej Times
www.khaleejtimes.com

How US midterm election results could affect global oil prices below $100

Global oil prices sharply declined on Wednesday, November 4th, following the midterm elections in the United States. Investors were assessing whether a political shift in Washington could help conclude the conflict with Iran.

According to Reuters data, Brent crude futures fell by 3.09 percent, reaching $100.40 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude from the US dropped by 3.13 percent to $93.08 at 14:17 GMT.

The price drop occurred after Democrats gained control of both chambers of the US Congress. This represented a political defeat for President Donald Trump, whose administration faces increasing pressure due to the war with Iran.

Investors are considering the possibility that the election outcomes might prompt Washington to reach a diplomatic agreement with Tehran instead of further military escalation. Trump told the Financial Times on Tuesday that the United States has no immediate plans for additional strikes against Iran. These statements helped ease some concerns about further disruptions in oil supplies, although uncertainty regarding the conflict's direction remains.

Reuters reports that oil markets are also reacting to hopes of progress in negotiations aimed at ending the wars in Iran and Ukraine. However, the prospect of peace does not guarantee a swift agreement. While markets show signs of relief, much will depend on the progress of peace talks, the security of shipping lanes, and the restoration of oil supplies from the Persian Gulf.

The Democratic victory granted this party greater influence in Congress, which could potentially strengthen oversight over the administration's decisions regarding military operations and foreign policy. Nevertheless, the newly elected Congress will not convene until January 2027, and the president retains significant authority in foreign policy matters. Therefore, the election result does not guarantee an immediate change in Washington's approach to Iran.

Reuters stated that some Gulf countries' governments believe that after the elections, Trump has a stronger incentive to reach a peace deal. Qatar has also intensified mediation efforts, although a high-ranking Iranian official told Reuters on Tuesday that Washington and Tehran are far from making a deal.

For oil markets, any progress toward an agreement can help reduce fears of further supply disruptions. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical route for the export of oil and gas from the Gulf. Disruptions in tanker movement have complicated the delivery of energy resources from producers to international buyers, contributing to increased transportation costs and uncertainty in global markets.

According to vessel tracking data from Vortexa, cited by Reuters, exports of crude oil, condensates, and petroleum products from the Gulf averaged 17.1 million barrels per day in October (excluding liquefied natural gas). This was lower than the September figure of 18.9 million barrels per day and accounted for approximately three-quarters of pre-war levels. These figures indicate that energy supplies remain significantly affected by the conflict. If shipping conditions improve, more oil may reach international markets, potentially easing downward pressure on prices.

Brent crude approached the $100 mark on Wednesday, but it remains unclear whether it will fall below this level or stay there. A breakthrough in negotiations between the United States and Iran could reduce the risk of further disruptions and stimulate a price decline. However, the resumption of military strikes or attacks on commercial vessels could quickly reverse this trend.

Global demand, production levels, and crude oil inventories also influence oil prices. Reuters reported that US crude oil inventories unexpectedly decreased by 5.27 million barrels in the week ending October 30th, according to industry data, providing some support to prices. This means that even if political tensions ease, other market factors could limit price declines.

A sustained decrease in crude oil prices could ultimately lower fuel costs for drivers and businesses. However, cheaper crude oil does not automatically mean an immediate drop in gasoline and diesel prices. Refining, transportation, distribution costs, and local pricing policies affect the final consumer price. In the UAE, fuel prices are adjusted monthly, so any changes in global oil markets may take time to reflect at gas stations.

Airlines and shipping companies could also benefit from lower energy costs, although these savings may not necessarily be immediately passed on to customers. Despite the recent dip, there is a risk of another increase. Any renewed military escalation involving Iran, further disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, or delays in peace talks could push prices up. Conversely, a weakening of global demand or improved energy supplies could exert downward pressure on prices. For now, the market remains sensitive to events in both Washington and the Middle East.

Attention will now focus on the next steps in negotiations between the US and Iran, the security of shipping lanes, and the restoration of Gulf oil exports. Investors will also monitor how the election results influence Washington's approach to the conflict in the coming months. Although oil prices fell after the election, a sustained decline will depend less on the political outcome itself and more on whether diplomatic successes can restore stability to global energy supplies.

Similar stories

Oil prices fall by 10% amid hopes for a swift end to the war with Iran following US midterm elections
Read more
business-standard.com

Oil prices fall by 10% amid hopes for a swift end to the war with Iran following US midterm elections

Brent crude oil prices fell by 10 percent, reaching a two-month low, as investors speculated that a Democratic Party victory in the US midterm elections could accelerate efforts to end the war with Iran and ease pressure on oil supply.

The global benchmark plummeted to a session low of $93.22 per barrel, the lowest figure in two months, while traders analyzed the election results, which were largely viewed as a referendum on affordability and the war, which generates strong domestic aversion. Meanwhile, West Texas Intermediate also sharply dropped below the $90 mark.

The drop in prices on Wednesday triggered selling from commodity market consultants tracking trends. Prices continued to fall after Vice President J. D. Vance directly linked the Republican Party's defeat to the foreign conflict. Investors adjusted their positions, factoring in an earlier-than-expected winding down of the conflict, while Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer stated his intention to end the war, noting that some Republicans would support these efforts. Any progress in resolving the situation could further increase flows through the vital Strait of Hormuz.

US President Donald Trump, for his part, told the Financial Times that he has no immediate plans to escalate military action in West Asia. The average price of gasoline exceeded $4 per gallon when Americans voted on Tuesday, marking a first-ever recorded level on election day.

Ajay Parmar, Director of Energy at ICIS, noted: 'Given this election outcome and the economic situation in Iran, a deal seems more likely than not. Trump's strength is significantly diminished.'

Technical factors also fueled the oil sell-off. According to data from Bridgeton Research Group at Kpler, trend-following traders reduced long positions in Brent from approximately 73 percent to 55 percent at the start of the session. These algorithmic traders are known for exacerbating price volatility.

The elections could be a turning point in the war, which lacked an immediate foreseeable end and destabilized energy flows in West Asia, causing oil prices to rise by about 50 percent this year. Supply constraints in the Persian Gulf, coupled with escalating Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries, also contributed to fuel price increases. Data from the US Energy Information Administration showed that domestic diesel inventories were below 100 million barrels for the first time since 2003, indicating that a truce will not bring immediate relief to the already strained global market.

However, physical prices in commodity markets have generally weakened recently, and flows through Hormuz remain close to pre-war levels. West Asian oil indicators suggest that short-term supply is outpacing demand for the first time since July, and North Sea cargo prices have also declined. Time spreads for both benchmarks have also generally narrowed, with several tightening to their lowest levels since mid-October. JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported in a study that global oil markets have returned to surplus due to recovery in West Asia, with a surplus of 1.4 million barrels per day in October.

CEO Amin Nasser stated on Tuesday during a post-results call that Saudi Aramco will maximize oil production this quarter, increasing supplies from near pre-war levels seen in October. According to sources close to the matter, the United Arab Emirates is considering building a third oil export pipeline that would transport crude oil around Hormuz.

Claudio Galimberti, Chief Economist at Rystad Energy, commented: 'Since both chambers can now pass resolutions, withhold war funding, and delay confirmations, the administration faces a shorter political timeline and greater institutional pressure to find a solution for Hormuz.'

_

Popular