Manager shares experience of firing 12 employees in an IT company after receiving instructions from top management
Read more
Aaj Tak
www.aajtak.in

Manager shares experience of firing 12 employees in an IT company after receiving instructions from top management

In the corporate environment, layoff announcements are often limited to workforce reduction and cost-cutting measures for the company. However, this also affects individuals who have to tell their colleagues about the necessity of layoffs. One employee, working as a delivery manager at an IT company in Chennai, shared a similar experience on the Reddit platform.

In his post, he stated that senior executives instructed him to fire twelve employees by Friday. He specified that all these people had worked with him since 2016 and addressed him affectionately as 'Anna,' which means older brother.

The manager wrote on Reddit that the company's senior management invited him to a closed meeting. There, they handed him an Excel spreadsheet with the names of twelve employees and required him to dismiss them all by Friday. According to the manager, he was supposed to hold a separate 15-minute meeting with each of these employees. He had worked with these people for about ten years, and for him, they were not just team members but like family.

The manager touched upon not only the topic of layoffs in his post but also many emotional aspects. He recounted that the team had repeatedly stayed in the office until three in the morning to solve production-related problems. Their daily life included shared meals, off-site tea breaks, and attending each other's weddings. The fact that team members called him 'Anna' made him upset when he was tasked with the responsibility of firing people he had worked with for so long.

In the post, the manager also mentioned the personal issues of some team members. He noted that one senior developer had taken out a large mortgage loan just four months prior. Another employee was dealing with his mother battling cancer, and his family depended on the company's medical insurance for treatment. A third employee was preparing for childbirth the following month. The manager expressed concern about how he could inform these people about the reduction during such a difficult time.

The manager also questioned the decision of the top management. He stated that layoff decisions are made by senior officials, but the responsibility for informing employees and managing their reaction falls on managers. He admitted that at one point, he considered quitting to avoid the duty of firing his colleagues. However, his wife explained to him that if he refused this job, someone else would take on this responsibility.

After publishing this post on Reddit, a discussion began regarding employment stability. Some users deemed government service more reliable, while others pointed out that in the private sector, despite better salaries and career opportunities, there is a risk of layoffs. Some also questioned whether the concept of job stability should mean the absence of accountability. During the discussion, many users agreed that the role of those making layoff decisions and the role of managers delivering that decision to employees are different. The manager's story shows that firing is not only a difficulty for the laid-off workers but also an emotionally heavy ordeal for those forced to announce it.

Similar stories

Employee claims manager demanded resignation due to high salary, not poor performance
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Employee claims manager demanded resignation due to high salary, not poor performance

When employees face work-related issues, low productivity or carelessness is often blamed. However, one employee from Bangalore put forward a different argument, claiming that the reason for his dismissal was his high salary because it was unprofitable for the company to pay him so much.

Following this, the employee began sharing his distress on social media. The question arose about what an employee should do when the reason for termination is related not to job quality but to salary size. He sought advice from Reddit users.

In his Reddit post, the employee stated that he works as a product manager at a company in Bangalore. He noted that his manager had been replaced only two months prior, and he did not understand why the manager asked him to resign in such a short time.

The employee claimed that the manager started insisting on his departure even before the performance review, citing that his current salary significantly exceeded the team's budget. He emphasized that he was never pointed out any deficiencies in his professional conduct or work results that could serve as grounds for dismissal.

The employee also expressed concern about the timing of the resignation offer. He mentioned that the next payroll period at the company was approaching around October 24th, yet he was already being asked to submit his resignation before that date. He wrote on Reddit that he did not know any reasons why he would have to leave his job.

Furthermore, according to the contract, he was entitled to a two-month notice period. Therefore, he wanted to know what the consequences might be if he did not leave voluntarily, but the company decided to terminate him.

After publishing the post, users began sharing their experiences. Some advised him not to rush into leaving. Others recommended keeping written documentation of conversations with the manager and any requests for resignation, and contacting HR if necessary.

Some users suggested starting a job search while continuing to work at the current place. Others believed that if the company truly wanted to cut costs, it could decide to eliminate a position.

Nevertheless, it should be noted that the advice provided on social media is the personal opinion of the users. The employee's post does not confirm that the company has officially initiated the termination procedure or that he submitted his own resignation. Furthermore, the report lacks any official response from the company.

Employee refuses to resign, prefers the company to fire him
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Employee refuses to resign, prefers the company to fire him

One employee experiencing significant pressure at work sought advice from Reddit users. He wishes to leave his position, but instead of submitting a resignation, he hopes that the company will terminate his employment. After posting this message on social media, a discussion began about the reasons why some workers prefer to be fired rather than quit voluntarily.

Possible reasons for this choice include workplace stress, the size of the compensation package, and uncertainty regarding finding a new job in the current labor market. The employee shared his problem on the r/QuitCorporate forum on Reddit, asking how to ask his manager to let him go.

In his Reddit post, he described his situation: he works at a large company, but due to increased workload and new responsibilities, he no longer feels peace of mind. It is becoming increasingly difficult for him to meet his boss's expectations. The employee fears how he can meet established deadlines and goals, and he experiences tension before meetings. Furthermore, he worries about the potential negative impact of the current situation on his career.

The employee emphasized that he does not want to resign himself. One reason is the lack of guarantees regarding securing the next job after leaving. Therefore, he is concerned about financial security. He noted that if the company fires him, he might receive a severance package, which would provide him with some financial support and allow him to escape the stressful job. This hope is what led him to discuss possible termination with his manager.

However, according to him, his boss stated that the company's reduction process was complete, and he would have to wait about a year before the next phase began.

In his post, the employee also mentioned that he is willing to accept a lower salary in the future, but his main condition is the absence of excessive work pressure and achieving peace of mind. For him, the priority is not only high income but also the ability to work without constant stress.

After the post appeared, users offered various opinions on the matter. Some advise the employee to consider his options instead of waiting for the company to fire him. Others emphasize the need to find a balance between work and mental health. Nevertheless, it should be noted that this case is based on one employee's post on Reddit.

Boss Banned Coffee at Work and Suggested Working Overtime to Drink It
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Boss Banned Coffee at Work and Suggested Working Overtime to Drink It

A story from an employee who reported a ban on coffee by their supervisor was published on the social media platform Reddit. The employee stated that their manager not only prohibited drinking coffee during working hours but also refused to accept coffee brought from home.

In the Reddit post, the worker specified that their manager had imposed a restriction on coffee consumption during work time. This ban applies not only to coffee from the office coffee machine but also to coffee brought in a thermos or in cans. Despite the fact that the office coffee machine is only about 20 seconds away, the employee is not allowed to drink coffee while working.

The situation is aggravated by the fact that the boss advised the employee that if they wanted to drink coffee, they should start the workday an hour later and stay at work longer. The worker noted that this advice is incomprehensible to them since they arrive at work on time. They also mentioned that some colleagues ask them to go to the coffee machine because it is difficult for them to work without coffee.

Despite the difficulties associated with the coffee ban, the employee intends to continue working in the position to improve their skills, as they perform specialized work.

The employee also shared complaints about the manager's behavior. They reported that after starting work, many warned them about the manager's manners. According to the worker, some long-term colleagues are afraid to voice doubts about the boss's decisions. Furthermore, there is a problem with office hours: the employee claims that the manager shifts the hours forward by three minutes, and when other employees try to correct it, the manager changes the time again.

The worker also mentioned that some people work overtime without objection. Reddit users reacted to the employee's post differently. One user advised looking for a better job, while another questioned whether the coffee ban was part of any safety or health regulations, which might be the case in some industrial facilities.

Other users advised the employee to keep records of the manager's behavior and contact senior management if necessary. However, it is unclear from the social media post whether the introduction of the coffee ban was based on official workplace policy or any safety measures.

Popular