Icrier study shows growth in female employment in India, but under less favorable conditions
Read more
Business Standard
business-standard.com

Icrier study shows growth in female employment in India, but under less favorable conditions

According to a study conducted by the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (Icrier), the number of women in the labor force in India has almost doubled between 2017–18 and 2025. However, this growth is concentrated in unprotected employment sectors, accompanied by a reduction in working hours and an expansion of the wage gap.

The study, titled 'Participation Paradox: Women's Work and Time Use in India from 2017–18 to 2025,' found that women have taken up more paid work, while their unpaid domestic responsibilities have not decreased. This has resulted in them having less time for rest and self-care.

The authors, including Tanu M Goyal, Shravani Prakash, Ketaki Gaikwad, and Arjuna Tandon, based on data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), reported that the number of working women increased from 104 million in 2017–18 to 201 million in 2025. Meanwhile, the ratio of female workers rose from 22 percent to 38 percent. It should be noted that the figures for 2025 are based on a revised PLFS with an increased sample size and calendar period, and the authors caution about the need for caution when comparing with 2017–18 data.

The increase in employment was concentrated in rural India and the agricultural sector. The female worker ratio in rural areas increased from 23.7 percent to 44.9 percent, while in urban areas it grew from 18.2 percent to 25.9 percent. The share of men in the primary sector of rural areas decreased from 54.1 percent to 47.2 percent, while the share of women in rural areas increased from 70.7 percent to 73.3 percent. The study noted: 'Structural transformation is visible for men, but it has largely bypassed women in the country.'

Regular wage employment could not keep pace with the growth rate. Among rural women, self-employed workers increased from 13.9 million to 56 million, raising their share in rural female employment from 18.6 percent to 37.2 percent. Meanwhile, regular wage employment increased from 7.9 million to 13.9 million, but its share decreased from 10.5 percent to 9.3 percent. The authors concluded that 'the additional women entering the workforce primarily came through self-employment and unpaid family labor, which are the most unstable and least paid categories.'

The authors suggest that such a sharp rise in rural India is harder to interpret as a reaction to improved opportunities; rather, it indicates that rural women are 'drawn in out of necessity, whether in agricultural activities or home-related enterprises.' The report also mentions an alternative view presented by the Economic Survey for 2023–24 and some researchers, according to which the growth was driven by opportunities.

Average weekly hours decreased for all groups between 2017–18 and 2025, but the working week for rural women decreased the most—by more than six hours. The study notes: 'The increase in participation along with the reduction in hours per worker implies an expansion of the workforce towards increasingly marginal, low-intensity activities.'

The wage gap also widened. The nominal monthly wage of rural men increased by approximately 65 percent over the specified period, while for rural women, this growth was 41 percent. In 2025, rural women earned about 45 percent of the monthly salary of rural men, compared to 53 percent previously. In nominal terms, the monthly gap in rural areas almost doubled, increasing from approximately 4200 rupees to over 8000 rupees.

Unpaid labor of women remained virtually unchanged. Time use surveys for 2019 and 2024 show that the difference in unpaid domestic labor remained generally constant—about 223 minutes per day among participants in 2024, and the difference in caregiving increased from 58 to 63 minutes. In 2024, working women also had less time for self-care than women overall: 18 minutes less in rural areas and 31 minutes less in urban areas, while working men had slightly more time than men overall.

Six out of ten women not in the labor force cited childcare and household obligations as the main reason, whereas men had almost no such reasons. The authors call for a shift from maximizing participation to ensuring structural transformation. They recommend implementing more childcare services, enforcing kindergarten rules, introducing paid paternity leave and shared parental leave, setting employment targets for women in production-related incentive schemes, as well as social protection for women working in the gig economy, and conducting regular time use surveys alongside PLFS.

Similar stories

ICRIER study shows that despite increased female employment in India, the burden of household chores remains predominantly on them
Read more
www.aajtak.in

ICRIER study shows that despite increased female employment in India, the burden of household chores remains predominantly on them

In India, there is an increase in the number of women entering the labor market, yet the volume of unpaid domestic work remains virtually unchanged. According to the ICRIER report titled 'Participation Paradox,' the share of women in the workforce has significantly grown over the past eight years, but the distribution of household chores has not changed.

The number of working women in India has increased from 104 million in 2017–2018 to 201 million by 2025. Consequently, their share in the labor force has risen from 22% to 38%.

This growth is particularly noticeable in rural areas. In rural areas, the share of women in the labor force increased from 23.7% in 2017–2018 to 44.9% in 2025. In urban areas, this figure rose from 18.2% to 25.9%. Nevertheless, despite more active participation in paid work, an equal division of household chores has not occurred.

The largest increase in female labor force participation was recorded in rural areas: from 23.7% in 2017–2018 to 44.9% in 2025. In cities, this figure rose from 18.2% to 25.9%.

Despite the increase in women's participation in paid work, men's contribution to housework remains low. According to statistics, women spend an average of 464 minutes daily on household chores, while men spend 178 minutes. This means that women perform 4 hours and 46 minutes more domestic work daily than men.

The burden of domestic care also affects women's free time. The gap between men and women regarding time allocated for rest and entertainment has widened: in 2019, this gap was 57 minutes, and by 2024, it reached 70 minutes.

Responsibility for the home and children continues to create difficulties for women when seeking employment. About 60% of surveyed women reported that they cannot work outside the home due to household duties and childcare, whereas only 1% of men cited domestic responsibilities as a reason for being unable to work.

Alongside labor force participation, a gender pay gap persists. In rural areas, women's wages are about 45% of men's, and in urban areas, this figure reaches 61%. Thus, even with an increase in the number of working women, their income does not match that of men.

These data indicate that despite entering the labor market, the division of household chores between women and men is not equal. Many women are forced to perform tasks such as cooking, cleaning, and childcare in parallel with office work, which negatively affects their personal time and rest.

Despite being employed, women continue to bear the main burden of household chores
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Despite being employed, women continue to bear the main burden of household chores

In modern society, women are actively stepping outside the home, achieving recognition in various fields. They work in offices, run their own businesses, and contribute significantly to the financial support of the family. However, despite gaining the freedom to work and earn, the burden of household duties remains the same for many women.

Every day, women spend most of their time caring for the home and family: from taking children to school to cooking, cleaning, and caring for elderly relatives. After finishing work, their responsibilities do not end, as domestic work awaits them. Compared to men, women have to dedicate less time to themselves, which negatively affects their careers, incomes, and opportunities for personal development.

A recent report revealed several serious issues concerning women's employment and time utilization. According to this study, even with increased participation of women in the workforce, the quality of their labor and income levels have not improved proportionally. This raises the question of why women remain economically vulnerable despite increased workload, and how the distribution of household chores affects their professional growth.

The role of women is critical to achieving the goal of transforming India into a developed country by 2047. According to the report, although India's economy exceeded $4 trillion in 2025, women's contribution to the country's GDP is only about 18 percent. It is projected that to reach $14 trillion by 2047, the female labor force needs to increase to approximately 400 million people, which means nearly doubling the current level.

The study titled 'Participation Paradox: Women's Work and Time Use in India (2017-18 to 2025)' was prepared by the Indian Council of Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER). It compared data on women's work and time use for the period 2017-18 to 2025, using statistics from the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) and the Time Use Survey (TUS).

The report emphasizes that while women's involvement in work has increased, there is no corresponding growth in the quality of their work, income levels, or productivity.

When assessing women's employment, it is insufficient to focus only on their work or earnings. Women also perform many unpaid domestic tasks, such as cooking, cleaning, and caring for children and the elderly. This is why working women often have to juggle responsibilities both in the office and at home.

Women spend significantly more time on domestic and caregiving tasks compared to men. This limits their ability to dedicate time to upskilling, seeking better career opportunities, and developing their profession.

Many women start their day with household chores: they take children to school, prepare breakfast and lunch, clean, and then go to work. After returning from work, their duties do not end; they once again have to deal with the kitchen, children's education, and other household matters.

As a result, it becomes extremely difficult for women to find time for themselves. The constant execution of a double burden leads not only to physical exhaustion but also to increased psychological pressure.

In Indian families, it is traditionally considered that the responsibility for running the household lies primarily with women. The main reason for this is old social mindset and upbringing. Girls are taught to cook, clean, and do housework from childhood, while boys are often kept away from these duties. These attitudes become ingrained habits as they grow older.

Many men view household chores not as their responsibility but as a task for women. In some families, there is a belief that a man's main function is to earn money, and the woman should manage the home. Nevertheless, since women now also contribute to the family's financial stability through work, an equitable division of household chores becomes necessary.

Cooking, childcare, and cleaning should be the shared responsibility of all family members, not just women.

The main message of the report is that the increase in the number of working women is a positive development, but an increase in numbers alone is not enough to strengthen their economic position. They also need higher wages, a safe working environment, opportunities for skill enhancement, and equal chances for promotion.

Furthermore, it is vital that household duties are divided equally between women and men. Only then can women be freed from the burden of dual responsibility and focus on their careers, thereby contributing to the country's economic progress.

Female Founders Contribute to the Development of India's Social Sector, Demonstrating Better Funding Metrics
Read more
timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Female Founders Contribute to the Development of India's Social Sector, Demonstrating Better Funding Metrics

According to a survey conducted among over 145 organizations working in the social impact sector, more than 57% of non-profit organizations have at least one female founder. This figure significantly exceeds the share of women among Indian startups, which is only 18%. Furthermore, the representation of women in the non-profit sector surpasses corporate leadership, where women hold only 1.8% of CEO positions, 4.4% of CFO positions, and 29% of executive director positions.

These results are part of a report by the non-profit accelerator Change Engine titled 'East of Good: A Gender Lens,' which focuses on access to flexible funding. The study covered small, medium, and large organizations differing by annual budget. The study sample was also almost evenly divided between organizations eligible for foreign funding (with FCRA or US 501(c)) and those that were not.

Of the over 145 surveyed organizations, nearly 31% are exclusively female-founded, and about 27% have both male and female founders. The study also showed that women not only create more non-profit organizations but the structures founded by them receive better funding and have access to more long-term flexible financing.

It was found that non-profit organizations with at least one female founder have larger budgets. Data indicates that 70% of such organizations have an annual budget exceeding 1 crore rupees, compared to 43.5% of organizations founded only by men. Additionally, about 21% of organizations with female founders allocate more than 25% of their budget to flexible unrestricted funding, whereas this figure is around 13% among organizations founded only by men. Flexible funding is non-programmatic funding that non-profit organizations can use to invest in talent, technology, research, and organizational strengthening.

Regarding long-term grants, it was found that over 65% of organizations with at least one female founder have access to multi-year funding sources (three years or longer), compared to approximately 56% of organizations founded only by men. Among them, about 27% of organizations with female founders received multi-year grants exceeding 1 crore rupees, while this figure was only about 11% for organizations founded only by men.

The report emphasizes that when assessing (on a scale of 1 to 5) the ease of attracting unrestricted funds from Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), High Net Worth Individuals (HNIs), domestic foundations, international foundations, and crowdfunding/retail, organizations with at least one female founder consistently received higher ratings across all categories, achieving an average score of 2.41 versus 2.06 for organizations founded only by men.

Nevertheless, challenges remain. The study shows that cheque sizes remain small for all: 'A striking 82% of organizations with at least one female founder and 83% of organizations founded only by men reported that typical unrestricted cheque sizes in India are less than 25 lakh rupees, demonstrating that the problem of small cheques affects both groups by gender,' the study notes.

Varun Aggarwal and Shubham Bansal, co-founders of Change Engine, noted that the data suggests that women are leading India's social sector and creating larger and better-resourced organizations. Aggarwal stated: 'We must encourage more women to enter this sector. In our accelerator, we meet female founders who are creating strong, ambitious institutions to solve some of India's biggest social problems. It is encouraging to see what we observe on the ground now supported by data. Six out of ten non-profit organizations in our survey were founded by a female founder.' Bansal added: 'However, the Change Engine founders emphasize that access to unrestricted flexible funding remains consistently low across all levels, as 80% of surveyed founders report difficulties in scaling their work due to the lack of unrestricted funding. This funding rigidity forces organizations to spend disproportionately more time on fundraising instead of focusing on innovation and impact.'

Popular