Electricity cost rise in South Africa amid Finance Ministry's refusal to cancel VAT
Read more
IOL
iol.co.za

Electricity cost rise in South Africa amid Finance Ministry's refusal to cancel VAT

Households in South Africa facing high electricity bills are forced to seek other forms of financial relief as the Ministry of Finance has ruled out the possibility of cancelling Value Added Tax (VAT) on electricity purchases.

According to DebtBusters, electricity tariffs have increased by 101% since 2021 and could reach 165% over the last decade. Despite these significant increases, the Ministry maintains that it does not plan to set a zero rate for electricity, either fully or up to a certain household consumption level.

The Department notes that the Ministry of Finance is aware of the tariff increases in recent years, but it has not yet conducted a specific assessment of the impact of VAT on electricity for low-income and middle-income segments. The Ministry insists that maintaining a broad VAT base is critical for the efficiency of the tax system, and a zero rate would lead to a reduction in government revenue.

According to the South African Revenue Service for 2025, the electricity, gas, and water sector generated approximately 22.21 billion rand in net VAT income in the 2024/25 fiscal year. Calculations show that an additional 150 rand in VAT is paid on a purchase of 1000 rand, and 450 rand on a purchase of 3000 rand.

Political pressure for VAT exemption

The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party is one of the parties advocating for including electricity in the list of goods and services subject to a zero VAT rate. MK Member of Parliament, Crown Prince Adil Nchabaleng, stated that the party presented this proposal to the Ministry during debates on VAT increases last year.

Nchabaleng emphasized that VAT increases financial pressure on households already struggling to pay for electricity. He considers it senseless to levy VAT on electricity in a weak economy that has yet to recover. Furthermore, he characterizes the tax as an 'inflationary tool' that diminishes the value of state-provided services.

He also raised the issue of double taxation, pointing out that VAT is charged even on free basic electricity, even though this provision is a grant. Nchabaleng noted that a household with an annual income of 50,000 rand spending 1000 rand per month on electricity dedicates almost a quarter of its annual income to energy, of which 1800 rand over 12 months is attributable to VAT.

However, the Organisation Against Tax Abuse (Outa) has not taken a final position on exempting electricity from tax. Executive Director Advocate Stephanie Fick believes that electricity should be subject to VAT unless it is recognized as a vital service requiring exemption. She added that the state would lose significant revenue that it cannot afford if it fails to act effectively.

The Ministry has not calculated the current fiscal cost of zero-rating all residential electricity and has not modeled the potential costs of exempting the first 50, 100, or 200 kWh consumed monthly by households.

Long-standing debate over zero rate

The proposal to cancel VAT, even partially, on household electricity consumption is not new. When VAT was introduced in 1991, the VAT Committee reviewed requests for a zero rate for basic electricity volume. It was ultimately decided that assistance to poorer households should be provided outside the tax system, rather than through VAT concessions.

This issue resurfaced in 2007 when the Ministry commissioned a study on the feasibility of maintaining existing VAT concessions. The analysis showed that a zero rate on electricity would be regressive, as wealthier households consume more electricity in absolute terms and would therefore receive the greater financial benefit. At that time, households spent about 15 billion rand annually on electricity, generating approximately 1.85 billion rand in VAT revenue.

In 2018, electricity was considered again when an independent commission appointed to review the list of zero-rated goods in South Africa received proposals for its inclusion. The commission rejected this proposal for similar reasons, concluding that higher-spending groups constitute a larger share of electricity expenditure and consequently receive greater benefits.

Free basic electricity remains the government's preferred option

Instead of providing aid through the VAT system, the government continues to rely on the Free Basic Electricity program to support needy households. Eligible households are allocated 50 kWh of electricity per month, and 21.6 billion rand has been allocated for basic energy in the 2026/27 budget.

The adequacy of this volume is currently under discussion. Last Friday, the Department of Energy published a revised Electricity Pricing Policy for public comment. The Department stated that pricing must balance economic efficiency with 'affordability and social justice considerations.' The policy stipulates that low-income households must have access to basic electricity through special or essential tariffs and other forms of direct or indirect subsidies.

The Ministry asserts that an intergovernmental working group is examining whether the existing monthly allocation of 50 kWh remains sufficient. However, the department warns that increasing this volume may not help more households if existing issues with the distribution of free basic electricity are not resolved. The Ministry points out that many needy households still do not receive the full benefit of the current provision due to weaknesses in registration, targeting, and delivery systems. Therefore, increasing the volume itself will not improve access or guarantee that additional funding reaches the intended recipients.

Similar stories

Government considers increasing the free electricity allowance to 200–300 kWh
Read more
iol.co.za

Government considers increasing the free electricity allowance to 200–300 kWh

The Minister of Electricity and Energy, Kgosientsho Ramkgoppa, stated that the government is studying the possibility of increasing the current Free Basic Electricity (FBE) norm from 50 kilowatt-hours per household per month to a level between 200 and 300 kilowatt-hours, but a final decision has not yet been made.

Ramkgoppa disclosed this information in response to questions from IFP parliamentarian Nomphumelelo Mkhlongo, who inquired how many low-income households could benefit from the proposed measures under the revised electricity pricing policy.

Mkhlongo also asked about conducting an impact assessment of the new pricing structure on household expenses and the timeline for developing this policy.

In his response, Ramkgoppa emphasized that the goal of this policy is to strengthen the protection of vulnerable electricity consumers and low-income citizens by reviewing the free basic electricity system and support mechanisms for them.

How many households can benefit?

The Minister specified that the government is considering increasing the existing FBE norm from 50 kWh to a qualified household monthly to the range of 200–300 kWh. He stressed that this is only a proposal for consideration, not an already active right.

Furthermore, Ramkgoppa noted that the number of beneficiaries from the revised measures will depend on the final identification and registration of eligible households, as well as the adopted approaches to financing and implementation.

He added that the department will be able to confirm the number of recipients after these issues are settled. Previously, the Cape Argus reported that out of approximately 2.8 million identified needy households, only 1.7 million received free basic electricity.

Many qualified households do not receive FBE

According to Ramkgoppa, reasons why qualified households did not receive the full benefit of FBE included gaps in the identification and registration of relevant households, limited municipal capacity, and a lack of uniformity in administration and maintenance of needy registries.

The Minister also mentioned that municipalities redirected funds allocated by the National Treasury to address other urgent tasks related to service provision and financial priorities.

He stated that the updated policy promotes the implementation of transparent tariff structures, adequate distribution of electricity costs, and oversight by the South African National Energy Regulator.

The proposed review of FBE aims to strengthen support for needy households. However, the impact of the new pricing structure on individual household expenses will depend on the tariffs applied, electricity consumption, supplier, and the implementation of relevant support measures.

Timeline for public consultation needs clarification

Responding to specific questions from ANC parliamentarian Zama Khanyase, Ramkgoppa explained that implementing the proposed measures will require coordination between the Department of Electricity and Energy, the National Treasury, the South African National Energy Regulator, and municipalities. This coordination is necessary to determine target groups, deliver FBE, develop lifeline tariffs, and monitor availability.

These mechanisms are intended to ensure that the sustainability of the power supply industry is achieved in parallel with protecting households least able to withstand rising electricity prices.

Ramkgoppa also stated that it is currently impossible to name a precise date for the final approval of the revised electricity pricing policy. He explained that this depends on public opinion review and the completion of necessary approval procedures.

The Cabinet approved the publication of the revised policy for public consultation on July 29, 2026. Although it was published a day earlier, Ramkgoppa extended the deadline for submitting proposals to October 28, 2026.

After the consultation period, the department will review the received comments, make necessary changes, and complete the relevant approval and consultation processes, including with the Council for National Economic Development and Labour, before presenting the final policy to the Cabinet.

From 2026, greenhouses with energy saving in Uzbekistan will be compensated for half of electricity costs
Read more
podrobno.uz

From 2026, greenhouses with energy saving in Uzbekistan will be compensated for half of electricity costs

Starting November 1, 2026, a new state support measure is being introduced in Uzbekistan for greenhouse farms that use energy-saving technologies. Under this measure, the state will reimburse 50% of electricity costs for greenhouses during the cold season, which is from October to March. This support program is planned to be effective until April 1, 2030.

Owners of greenhouse complexes that use advanced methods for heat retention and heating can receive compensation. Such modern solutions include heat-saving coatings, heat pumps, geothermal systems, solar thermal installations, as well as high-efficiency electric heating systems.

The main goal of this initiative is to help enterprises reduce operating costs in months when energy consumption for heating facilities reaches its maximum. The new program is of interest to farmers, agricultural companies, and businessmen who have either already implemented energy-saving solutions or intend to modernize their heating systems.

Reducing electricity bills will allow greenhouse farms to manage resources more rationally and decrease their financial burden during the winter period. It should be noted that local authorities have previously tightened requirements for greenhouse heating in Tashkent and five districts of the region, obliging farms to abandon the use of coal and other solid fuels, or to install corresponding emission cleaning and automatic monitoring systems.

Government considers abolishing fuel taxes but faces serious financial obstacles
Read more
iol.co.za

Government considers abolishing fuel taxes but faces serious financial obstacles

Despite an initial statement that there would be no immediate reduction in fuel prices for drivers, the government announced a temporary postponement of price increases for November and December. The complete abolition of fuel taxes is also being discussed, but it is expected not to happen anytime soon.

Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, responding to questions in a recent radio interview on station 702, stated that the government intends to eventually phase out the General Fuel Levy (GFL). However, he warned that the resulting huge revenue deficit would have to be compensated by other sources of income.

Godongwana noted: 'We must find a way to phase it out. But by doing so, we will lose about 80 billion rand.' He added that the issue of closing this gap would be subject to discussion.

The Minister also stated that the funding mechanism for the Road Accident Fund (RAF) would need to be reviewed. He emphasized that simply excluding the RAF would lead to a significant reduction in fuel costs, as it includes a charge of 2 rand per liter.

Godongwana did not provide timelines for the possible abolition of fuel levies. In the long term, it may become more difficult for the government if electric vehicle sales begin to grow rapidly, as these vehicles are not subject to fuel taxes.

Fuel Price Overview

Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy Gwede Mantashe previously stated that his department is reviewing the Regulatory Accounting System used to determine the margin included in fuel prices. This process is expected to be completed by March 2027.

In total, the two main levies add more than 6 rand to the cost of every liter of petrol. Currently, the GFL is 4.10 rand per liter of petrol and 3.93 rand per liter of diesel, while the RAF levy is 2.25 rand per liter of both fuels.

During his speech announcing the medium-term budget policy last week, Godongwana announced temporary measures to reduce fuel prices for the next two months. From November 4 to December 1, the GFL will be reduced by 1.50 rand per liter of petrol and by 3.00 rand per liter of diesel. Then, from December 2 to January 5, 2027, the reduction will be 1.00 and 1.50 rand respectively.

However, this reduction will be offset by the upcoming price increase, as the latest data from the Central Energy Fund (CEF) indicates a rise of 1.16 rand per liter of petrol and 1.40 rand per liter of diesel.

Fiscal Implications

Economists had previously warned that cutting fuel taxes could have other negative consequences. Hannah Marais, South Africa's chief economist at Deloitte Africa, recently told IOL that reducing fuel taxes entails huge fiscal costs.

Marais stated: 'Such relief will likely require additional borrowing or spending cuts somewhere, while maintaining fiscal credibility and supporting sustainable public finances remains particularly important for South Africa.'

Sanisha Packirisamy, group economist at Momentum, added that covering high fuel prices through additional government borrowing risks increasing the yield on government bonds and weakening the rand, while cutting public spending in other areas carries its own socio-economic costs of growth.

Packirisamy noted: 'It is politically difficult to argue against providing assistance to burdened consumers, but repeated extensions create an unrealistic expectation that the government will absorb every external energy shock.'

Popular