Rahul Gandhi and Nirmala Sitharaman clash over sale of stake in IDBI Bank
Read more
The times of India
timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Rahul Gandhi and Nirmala Sitharaman clash over sale of stake in IDBI Bank

Rahul Gandhi of the Congress and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman entered into a dispute on social media regarding the government's decision to sell its stake in IDBI Bank. The opposition leader in Lok Sabha supported protesting employees.

After Rahul wrote to 'IDBI Bank family members,' he accused the government of selling banks, which contradicts the establishment of banks during the Congress rule. He stated in an X post: 'During the Congress era, IDBI was created to develop the nation's industry. During Modi's time, first an auction was conducted, and then the price was set.'

He also questioned the necessity of selling a stake in a bank that earned a profit of 900 billion rupees last year.

In response, Sitharaman accused the Congress of using banks and financial institutions as 'personal structures' and pressuring employees to 'issue loans at their discretion, bypassing reasonable lending norms.'

She noted that the Modi government inherited IDBI Bank, which was in poor condition because Congress politicians forced it to provide money to business houses such as Videocon, Winsome Diamond, ABG Shipyard, and Kingfisher, with whom they had close ties. 'These loans turned bad, leading to huge losses for IDBI Bank, which we acknowledged.'

The Finance Minister stated that thanks to a recapitalization of 250 billion rupees, the Modi government restored health to the bank. She emphasized that in the 'strategic restructuring' of IDBI, due process was followed, refuting reports of government misconduct when completing the deal that will bring over 520 billion rupees to the Centre and LIC.

Sitharaman added: 'The banking system of the Congress era had a phone book for influential people and a set of rules for ordinary citizens. The era of 'connections and banking favors' is over. Now ordinary people have easy access to loans, and employees are not under pressure to issue loans over the phone.'

IDBI Bank unions announced a strike on November 2 and 3 against the government's move to sell its stake. Rahul supported the employees, stating: 'I support you in your fight today and fully support all your legitimate demands.'

Rahul also mentioned that he had raised a question in Parliament about the reasons for the decision to sell the profitable bank. 'The government gave no reasons. Now it has decided to sell IDBI Bank to the Canadian company Fairfax,' he wrote, referencing a meeting with employees in March.

Similar stories

Who will replace Hardik Pandya: Three Indian players demonstrated potential in the match against New Zealand
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Who will replace Hardik Pandya: Three Indian players demonstrated potential in the match against New Zealand

The search for a player capable of replacing Hardik Pandya, who is a valuable all-rounder, remains relevant for the Indian team. Such a player must be able to play in the starting lineup, reliably bowl four overs, and have the ability to finish the match at a critical moment. However, if Hardik is unavailable, the Indian team found an answer to this question in Christchurch when playing against New Zealand, thanks to Tilak Verma, Naman Dheer, and Nitish Kumar Reddy.

Instead of preparing one player to replace Hardik, the team bet on three young athletes. India needs players who can contribute both in attack and defense. Therefore, the search for alternative all-rounders constantly remains important. This season, Shivam Dube played his role in the T20 World Cup, and players like Nitish Kumar Reddy and Naman Dheer also received opportunities. Tilak Verma possesses attacking qualities that strengthen the team's middle order.

In the second T20 International match against New Zealand, India needed to score 181 runs. At one point, the team lost five wickets with only 70 runs. Mitchell Stainer's bowling created difficulties for the Indian batting, taking four wickets while conceding 21 runs in 4 overs.

Naman Dheer helped revive hopes of an Indian victory by scoring 31 runs off 17 balls, including a six against Stainer. After Dheer came out, Tilak Verma and Nitish Kumar Reddy took responsibility. Tilak remained on the field with 51 runs unbeaten, and Reddy scored 26 runs unbeaten off 13 balls. Both players formed a strong partnership of 69 runs for the seventh wicket.

India won by four wickets, scoring 181 runs in 19.5 overs with six wickets down, gaining a 2-0 advantage in the five-match series. This partnership was the largest in the history of Indian T20 International cricket for the seventh wicket.

Tilak demonstrated that he is capable not only of stabilizing the innings under pressure but also of scoring quickly, scoring 51 runs unbeaten off 26 balls. The specialty of his game lies in understanding the bowler's plan and choosing appropriate shots. New Zealand bowler Jacob Duffy tried to play considering the long boundary from the outside, but Tilak changed his position and utilized the short boundary on the left side. He did not rush, waiting for the right moment, and stayed on the field until the end.

Like Hardik, Tilak is capable of big hits under pressure, but his main role is related to the attack. Thus, he may not be a direct replacement for Hardik, but rather a player who strengthens the team's middle order and finishing ability.

Naman Dheer scored 31 runs off just 17 balls in this match. His innings gave speed to India at a time when the pressure to score was increasing due to consecutive wicket losses. He adopted an aggressive stance against spinners and showed that he can counter bowlers even in difficult circumstances.

Dheer's usefulness is not limited to just batting; he can also bowl, giving the team an additional option. Nevertheless, to fulfill a regular role in four overs, like Hardik, he will need to consistently contribute to his defensive play.

Nitish Kumar Reddy is one of the most natural options for an all-rounder in this trio. He bowls fast and is capable of scoring quickly in the lower middle order. In the second T20, he supported Tilak well, scoring 26 runs unbeaten at a strike rate of 200. At the end of the match, playing in the attack, it is important to know how to read the bowler's next move and remain calm. Reddy managed this task in a difficult situation, helping India take control of the match and scoring the winning runs.

India is preparing him to take on important responsibilities in defense. However, quick innings in the attack alone will not be enough to replace Hardik. Reddy must regularly influence the defensive play as well.

The performance of Tilak, Dheer, and Reddy showed India a useful alternative. Together they scored 108 runs off 56 balls, proving their potential in a tough match. However, Hardik's specialty is that he contributes significantly in both attack and defense. These young players are still in the process of fulfilling such comprehensive responsibility at that level. The good news for India is that it has young players with various strengths. If Tilak continues to score in the middle order, Dheer will contribute to the defense with aggressive batting, and Reddy...

Popular