allworld.mediaNews from all over the world
Three long-standing employee demands regarding inflation allowance indexing discussed in the 8th Calculation Committee
Read more
Aaj Tak
www.aajtak.in

Three long-standing employee demands regarding inflation allowance indexing discussed in the 8th Calculation Committee

Three old demands concerning the inflation allowance (DA) for civil servants and pensioners were once again raised during the work of the 8th Calculation Committee. The documents submitted by trade unions contain a request for quarterly changes to the DA, its inclusion in the base salary upon reaching a 25% level, and exemption from income tax.

It is noteworthy that all these proposals were first put forward more than 20 years ago, before the 6th Calculation Committee, but were not accepted then, and the 7th Calculation Committee also did not provide recommendations on them. Currently, the discussion of these demands has resumed, although a final decision on their implementation has not yet been made.

Currently, the increase in the inflation allowance for central employees and the inflation compensation allowance for pensioners usually occurs twice a year. Trade unions insist that changes to DA and DR should happen every three months to reduce the financial burden of rising prices on employees. 'Bharat Pensioners Samaj' requested a quarterly adjustment of DA/DR based on the average indicator over three months in its memorandum to the 8th Calculation Committee.

The community also emphasized that inflation compensation must be provided without any rounding or reductions. This requirement is not new; it was also presented to the 6th Calculation Committee, which rejected the proposal to review DA every three months instead of six months, citing a lack of strong justification. The committee recommended maintaining the existing system of reviewing DA twice a year, on January 1st and July 1st, which is still in use.

The second major claim relates to integrating DA into the base salary. The 'Federation of National Postal Organizations' (FNPO) demands that when DA or DR exceeds a 25% level, it be added to the base salary or base pension. Thus, the trade unions aim to avoid waiting until 50% is reached to include part of the inflation allowance in the base salary. However, this is only a proposal, and the 8th Calculation Committee has not yet made a decision on this matter.

The history of this demand is also long. The 5th Calculation Committee proposed creating an inflation allowance (Dearness Pay) by adding 50% of the DA to the base salary. Later, trade unions managed to lower this threshold to 25%. The 6th Calculation Committee clearly stated that it did not recommend adding DA to the base salary at any level, arguing that such a change might require adjusting the base index used for calculating inflation, which was not considered necessary in its proposed pay structure.

The third demand concerns the taxation of the inflation allowance. FNPO argues that DA compensates for additional expenses caused by inflation and demands its complete exclusion from the taxable base. The organization also proposed completely exempting allowances such as HRA and transport allowances from taxes. The argument is that the purpose of these allowances is to cover costs related to price increases, not to increase the real wealth or economic solvency of the employee.

Imposing taxes on these payments results in a portion of the inflation allowance effectively being returned as taxes. This demand was also presented to the 6th Calculation Committee, but it did not provide recommendations on it. Now, FNPO has raised this issue again before the 8th Calculation Committee. If this demand is adopted, it may affect the tax burden on employees. Currently, no new decision on tax benefits for DA has been made.

These three demands related to DA were recorded in Chapter 4.1 of the 6th Calculation Committee's report. However, the proposals for quarterly review and inclusion of DA in the base salary were not accepted, and the committee provided no recommendations on the issue of tax benefits. Subsequently, the 7th Calculation Committee also did not provide separate recommendations on these three demands in its report. In January 2014, DA exceeded the 100% level based on the 6th Calculation Committee's report. At that time, the employee side argued that the real value of the salary was decreasing because DA was not included in the base salary. However, this argument related to the date of salary revision implementation, not the new rule for including DA in the base salary.

Before the 8th Calculation Committee, the trade unions once again presented these three demands. Their goal is to accelerate inflation compensation, lower the threshold for including DA in the base salary, and reduce the tax burden on allowances. Currently, these are just demands, not approved rules. Whether the committee will accept these demands, modify them, or reject them, as previous committees have done, will only become clear after its recommendations and government decisions. Therefore, employees and pensioners should not assume that quarterly DA review, inclusion at 25%, or tax benefits are current provisions.

Similar stories

Questions on including the inflation index in the basic salary within the 8th Pay Commission
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Questions on including the inflation index in the basic salary within the 8th Pay Commission

Several important questions have arisen surrounding the eighth Pay Commission regarding the inflation indexation (DA) for government employees and pensioners. Topics under discussion include the possible merger of the current DA with the basic salary, changes to the formula for calculating inflation payments, and potential increased support for employees amid rising prices. Union workers have intensified their demands, basing them on recommendations from previous pay commissions, to understand how indexation was regulated previously and what expectations are associated with the new commission.

Currently, government employees receive an inflation allowance (DA) of 60% of the basic rate under the seventh Pay Commission, while pensioners receive a similar compensation (DR). The key question is on what basis the DA will be calculated after the recommendations of the eighth commission are adopted. If the previous practice continues and the DA is revised in the new wage structure, there is a possibility that the current DA rate could be reset and started from scratch, although this is not yet determined and depends on the final decisions of the eighth commission and government approval.

The fifth Pay Commission recommended ensuring full inflation compensation at all levels of wages. It also proposed transforming the inflation allowance into Dearness Pay when the Consumer Price Index (CPI) exceeds the base index by 50%. This allowance should be included in the calculation of various financial benefits, including pension care allowances. The Commission deemed it unnecessary to create separate indices for different categories of workers and suggested calculating DA based on the average value of the All India Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers (AICPI-IW) over 12 months, using the 1982 base year.

The sixth Pay Commission rejected the demand to include DA in the basic salary. The Commission stated that the new wage system provides for periodic adjustment of tariff rates and allowances, so transforming DA into Dearness Pay is not necessary. Furthermore, it was noted that transitioning to Dearness Pay would require logically changing the base index. The committee also rejected the demand for quarterly DA adjustments, maintaining the system of approving DA twice a year—on January 1st and July 1st—with payments in March and September for administrative convenience.

The seventh Pay Commission recommended maintaining the existing DA calculation methodology, as it considered this formula long-established and not requiring significant changes. Thus, before the eighth commission, the question arises again whether it will follow this scheme or make changes to the methods of calculating and compensating inflation.

Union demands aim for the inflation allowance to be integrated into the basic salary after reaching a certain level. The Federation of National Postal Organizations (FNPO) proposed considering the possibility of merging DA or DR with the basic salary or pension if they exceed 25%. The organization also insists on providing exact inflation compensation without rounding, i.e., 'point by point'. The Indian Pensioners' Association also proposed considering the inclusion of DR in the basic pension and changing the procedure for adjusting the inflation allowance. It is important to note that these are only union proposals, not approved commission recommendations.

Some worker groups demand quarterly revisions of DA and DR. The Indian Pensioners' Association believes that the calculation of DR should be based on a three-month average to avoid discrepancies due to rounding when compensating for inflation. The existing system provides for two annual revisions of DA, so the eighth commission faces the task of considering procedural changes to ensure greater support for employees and pensioners during rapid inflation growth. However, the commission's stance on this matter is not yet clear.

Problems also arise around the method of calculating DA based on the AICPI-IW index. Many organizations argue that the family size considered for index calculation should be five people, not three, for a more accurate assessment of real family expenses. The Indian Railway Technical Supervisors Association (IRTSA) objects to defining the 'working class' in the index, arguing that it does not reflect the expenditure needs of government employees. Furthermore, IRTSA questioned the use of geometric averaging in the 2016 series, believing it might underestimate the impact of price increases.

IRTSA also drew attention to the sixth Pay Commission's recommendation to create a separate inflation index based on government employee surveys. In the organization's view, employees working in cities of different categories need such a specialized index.

Discussion of arrears (ariir) within the 5th, 6th, and 7th departmental commissions, as well as prospects for the 8th commission
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Discussion of arrears (ariir) within the 5th, 6th, and 7th departmental commissions, as well as prospects for the 8th commission

The main concern among central employees regarding the 8th departmental commission is when they will receive a salary increase and whether they will be paid arrears (ariir) for the period starting January 1, 2026. If the implementation of the commission's recommendations takes a long time, there is a possibility that employees may receive funds in the form of ariir. However, the government has not made an official statement regarding ariir at this time. Labor unions are demanding that changes to salaries take effect from January 1, 2026.

The eighth central departmental commission was formed by the government in December 2025. The chairman of the commission is Ranjan Prakash Desai, a former Supreme Court judge. Pulak Ghosh, a professor at IIM Bangalore and a member of the Prime Minister's economic advisory council, as well as Pankaj Jain, a senior IAS officer serving as secretary, are non-official members of the commission. The commission has been given eighteen months to prepare its report.

According to this schedule, the report is expected to appear around May 2027. After that, the government will review the recommendations, and the process of changing salaries will only begin after its approval. If the government approves January 1, 2026, as the date for salary changes, employees may receive ariir from that date, despite the delay in implementing the 8th departmental commission's recommendations. Nevertheless, this is currently just a supposition, not a final decision; the final date depends on government approval and notification.

Suppose the government sets the effective date for the salary change as January 1, 2026, but the actual payment of the increased salary starts later. In that case, the difference for the period from January 2026 until the start of the new salary payment may be paid to employees in the form of ariir. For example, if the new salary only starts coming in July 2027, but the salary change is considered effective from January 1, 2026, employees may receive ariir for the 18-month period. The actual amount of ariir will depend on how the government approves the new salary, inflation allowances, and other conditions.

The experience of past departmental commissions shows that employees have been paid ariir in cases of delays in applying recommendations. During the 5th and 6th departmental commissions, the payment of ariir became a serious issue affecting public finances, both for central employees and pensioners. The 7th departmental commission approached this issue differently: it limited the amount of ariir in its recommendations, so it did not have a major impact on the state treasury. However, the experience of older commissions does not guarantee that the 8th departmental commission will also provide ariir; clarity will only emerge after the publication of the commission's report and the government's decision.

The 7th departmental commission set the effective date for the salary change as January 1, 2016. Prior to this, the employees' side demanded changes from January 1, 2014, arguing that this was due to the increase in the inflation allowance and the decrease in the real purchasing power of the salary. However, the commission deemed January 1, 2016, to be appropriate. Its argument was that the 7th departmental commission was established in 2014, and the deadline for its entry into force was January 1, 2016. This demonstrates that determining the effective date depends on both the commission's recommendations and government decisions.

The 8th departmental commission is also discussing the fitment factor. The fitment factor is a multiplier used to convert the current basic salary into an adjusted basic salary. However, to fully understand its impact, the inflation allowance must also be taken into account. The 7th departmental commission set the fitment factor at 2.57. It included part of the inflation allowance merger, so it cannot be assumed that this means a real salary increase of 157 percent. According to the commission's report, the share of real salary growth was significantly smaller. The final fitment factor for the 8th departmental commission has not yet been determined. Similarly, the calculation of ariir will depend on the final salary structure and the date set by the government.

Even if the decision on the recommendations of the 8th departmental commission is made in 2027, the probability of receiving ariir from January 1, 2026, remains. But for this, the government needs to approve January 1, 2026, as the effective date for the salary change. If a different effective date is set, the ariir period will change accordingly. Therefore, employees should closely monitor two points: when the commission's recommendations arrive and what effective salary change date the government sets. The final situation regarding ariir and the fitment factor in the 8th departmental commission will only become clear after the government's decision and official notification.

Popular