Women's protests in Andhra Pradesh against the sale of hard liquor led to a ban
Read more
The Better India
thebetterindia.com

Women's protests in Andhra Pradesh against the sale of hard liquor led to a ban

In 1991, a group of women from the village of Dubagunta, located in Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh state, organized a protest, forcing a local liquor store to close using brooms, sticks, and chili powder.

Many of these women had recently been learning to read through evening literacy courses for adults. After two years, the anti-liquor movement spread across the state and compelled the government to impose a ban on the sale of this cheap spirit, which was eroding the financial well-being and peace of families, starting October 1, 1993.

How education changed the discussion

The anti-liquor movement did not begin with a protest, but with an educational initiative. In January 1990, the Literacy Mission launched its campaign in Nellore. As the women attended reading classes, they began openly discussing the problems troubling their households, many of whom cited hard liquor as the cause of these issues.

Researcher Rekha Pandey notes that the spark occurred when drunken men insulted the literacy instructors, and the present women drove them away. The publication Deccan Chronicle adds that the story of a woman named Sitamma from the evening school further inspired the activists.

The scale of their discontent was significant. According to Pandey, there were 864 liquor stores operating in Nellore. The agency Feminism in India reports that state excise revenue grew from 39 crore in 1970–71 to 812 crore in 1991–92. In the same year, the average family in Andhra Pradesh earned 1840 rupees and spent 830 rupees on alcohol.

Brooms, chili powder, and the warehouse

Vardhini Resama, then an illiterate agricultural worker around sixty years old, led the women from Dubagunta. As noted by the New Indian Express, she joined the movement in 1991, inspired by the book 'Mahila Meluko.'

Deccan Chronicle reports that they first destroyed toddy barrels, assuring families dependent on that trade, and then stormed the liquor store despite police intervention. Historian Jidigunta Chalapati Rao adds that they attacked the local warehouse and expelled alcohol smugglers, with most early protesters being poor women from Scheduled Caste and Educated Class.

Women from neighboring villages followed them. The Nellore NGO Jagruti filed a public interest lawsuit against auctions, and the campaign turned into a confrontation with contractors, local officials, the police, and ultimately, the minister. Feminism in India records that contractors funded gangs to protect their monopoly, while the government claimed it could not close stores because the money from alcohol sales was used for social programs.

Pandey presents calculations of this argument: the state spent 1.50 rupees for every kilogram of subsidized rice but received 3.50 rupees from alcohol. The women countered by proposing daily wages instead, demonstrating that they offered an alternative rather than just objecting. They also questioned why water and schools were in deficit while hard liquor was always available, as noted by Feminism in India.

When about 50,000 people, 80% of whom were women, marched against liquor sales auctions in 1992, the police attacked the protesters. In 1992, women in Goa also fought against a bar license in the village of Tivrem and succeeded in having it revoked after a long struggle that included demonstrations and visits to government offices.

From liquor ban to total prohibition

The pressure proved effective. Subsequently, the minister banned the sale of hard liquor starting October 1, 1993, according to The News Minute. Since foreign spirits continued to be sold, the women's groups insisted on a complete ban, and N. T. Rama Rao of the Telugu Desam party promised this during the 1994 election campaign. He implemented a total ban on January 16, 1995, shortly after taking office as minister.

What the ban left behind

The ban did not survive the government that introduced it. On April 1, 1997, approximately 28 months after the ban began, the next minister repealed it. Although the effectiveness of alcohol bans is still debated, the idea that women can decide what is sold in their own neighborhoods has resonated since. In 2016, women from the village of Kachabali in Rajasthan campaigned until 94% of voters supported closing the only liquor store in the village.

Resama died on August 7, 2016, at the age of 93. In recent years, she lived in difficult conditions and underwent dialysis after the land allocated to her by the government was seized. Nevertheless, the woman who could not read when she picked up a broom gave her name to the village, and every report of her death referred to her as Dubagunta Resama.

Similar stories

39,815 permanent houses built for rural families in Uttarakhand under the PMAY-G scheme
Read more
timesofindia.indiatimes.com

39,815 permanent houses built for rural families in Uttarakhand under the PMAY-G scheme

According to state government data, since 2022, 39,815 permanent houses have been provided to rural families in Uttarakhand under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana – Gramin (PMAY-G) program.

The highest number of constructed houses was registered in Udham Singh Nagar, with 4,882 counted there. This is followed by Haridwar with 4,493 houses and Rudraprayag with 4,032. Chamoli has 3,900 houses built, while Pitorgarh and Pauri account for 3,386 and 3,195 houses, respectively. In Uttarkashi, 3,057 houses were constructed under this scheme.

Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami has appealed to the Central Government for the allocation of additional housing subsidies for both the rural and urban components of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. The state government also reported that Uttarakhand has received national recognition for its results under PMAY-Urban 2.0.

The PMAY-G program, launched in 2016, aims to provide permanent housing with basic amenities to homeless families, as well as those living in dilapidated or semi-destroyed houses in rural areas. Eligible beneficiaries receive financial assistance of ₹1.30 lakh per house through direct transfer to their bank accounts.

Furthermore, since 2022-23, the state has increased support for purchasing kitchen utensils and other kitchen items from ₹5,000 to ₹6,000. Beneficiaries are also provided with an additional amount of ₹12,000 for toilet construction under the Clean India Mission through MGNREGA/SWajal.

Under the BB Ramji Yojana scheme, beneficiaries are provided with 95 days of employment for constructing their homes. Housing support is supplemented by access to essential services such as drinking water, LPG connections under the Ujjwala scheme, and electricity.

Other districts covered by the program include Dehradun with 2,839 houses, Champawat with 2,789, Bageshwar with 2,279, Tehri with 2,134, Nainital with 1,480, and Almora with 1,349 houses.

Pushkar Singh Dhami stated: 'Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, our government strives to provide a permanent home to every needy family. We are constantly working to ensure that the benefits of PMAY-G reach every eligible family.'

Government loan of 200 thousand rupees helped young resident of Saharanpur revive family pottery business
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Government loan of 200 thousand rupees helped young resident of Saharanpur revive family pottery business

For Devendra Kumar, a resident of Jaroda Panda village in Saharanpur, clay has always been more than just raw material; it has been the foundation of his life and livelihood. His family craft of making clay pottery and other items, which he practiced since childhood, eventually declined, forcing him to close the business. To support his family, he started working as a horse cart driver, but this also became a heavy burden on the family.

The situation changed in 2025 when Devendra learned about the Uttar Pradesh state government's program—the 'Matikala Rojgaar Yojana' (Matikala Employment Program). He applied to the Hadi Handicrafts Department and, under this program, received a loan of two lakh rupees. After receiving the credit, Devendra decided to resume his traditional craft on a larger scale.

With the funding, working with clay returned to his home. He now produces not only traditional pottery but also various items according to market demand. Among his products are flower pots, planters, decorative water containers, glass items, piggy banks, lamps, and various figurines. According to Devendra, he makes over two dozen types of clay products.

The most significant changes have occurred in sales. Previously, buyers came from the village only occasionally, often leaving finished products unsold, and the low price did not allow for sufficient profit, which ultimately led to the gradual closure of the business. However, the situation is different now.

Thanks to the government program, Devendra receives orders not only from Saharanpur but also from cities such as Chartawal, Muzaffarnagar, Karnal, and other settlements. He notes that he is now paid good money for the finished products, and demand is constantly growing. Thus, the very clay business he had to give up has once again become a significant source of income for his family. Devendra emphasizes that he produces goods according to incoming demand. Demand for lamps and other clay items also increases during Diwali. For example, he received a large order to produce carts of pots from Karnal.

The Matikala program provided Devendra with another opportunity: he was invited to Lucknow to showcase his clay products. He sent several attractive items there and also prepared and sent a model of a temple. This model was approved and subsequently taken to Lucknow. For Devendra, this was the first time his craft reached such a level. Devendra believes that his story is not just one of restarting a business; thanks to the income from this venture, he was able to hold his children's wedding and provide for his family. His two sons work, and other family members also assist in the work. His wife and children are also involved in this business.

Today, Devendra works with four other people. That is, a business that was once closed due to decline and low sales has now become a source of employment for others. Devendra says that the family works constantly, and four other people work for him. He notes that the received loan helped restore the business. Nevertheless, he believes that if he had received a larger loan, he could have built a larger factory and increased production. He has both labor and demand, but large-scale production requires additional resources.

The clay business was connected to Devendra's life since childhood; his father also engaged in this on a large scale. After an accident involving his father, the responsibility fell on Devendra. He took over management, but the business was not thriving then. Over time, when the work slowed down, he closed it. Now, after many years, this family craft has returned with new methods and markets. Devendra points out that previously he worried about selling finished products, but now demand comes from various places. During festivals like Diwali, the demand for items such as lamps increases, while at other times pots, flower pots, figurines, and other items are produced.

The loan of two lakh rupees, obtained under the Matikala Employment Program, gave Devendra a chance to revive his closed business. Today, his clay products leave the village and reach other cities. The family supports its needs through this business, and four other people find employment alongside it. For Devendra, this family craft has once again become the foundation of his family and employment.

Popular