According to WWF report, average wild animal populations have decreased by 73% since 1970, but India shows success in species recovery.
Read more
The times of India
timesofindia.indiatimes.com

According to WWF report, average wild animal populations have decreased by 73% since 1970, but India shows success in species recovery.

According to the second edition of the WWF's Living Planet Report (LPR), between 1970 and 2022, there was an average global sharp decline of 73% in monitored wildlife populations. However, India has become one of the countries that has successfully achieved the recovery of certain animals, including tigers, rhinos, and Ganges dolphins.

Although the LPR does not provide data for individual countries, experts commenting on the upcoming release noted significant changes in India's biodiversity. In the country, nine mammal species are listed as 'critically endangered' according to the criteria of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Furthermore, 39% of 942 bird species showed a 'clear decline,' and 32% (136 species) of amphibians were 'threatened' due to a combination of factors such as climate change and agricultural practices.

The nine mammals classified as critically endangered in India include the Kashmiri deer/Hangul, Malabar large-spotted civet, Chinese pangolin, Andaman shrew, Jenkins' shrew, Nicobar shrew, Namdap's flying squirrel, large rodent, and leaf-nosed bat.

The report is based on the Living Planet Index (LPI), which tracks the status of species populations worldwide. This index, developed by the Zoological Society of London, covers 35,803 population trends of 5,790 vertebrate species (mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and fish) from 1970 to 2022.

The index recorded the sharpest reduction in freshwater ecosystems (-85%), followed by terrestrial ecosystems (-69%) and marine ecosystems (-59%) relative to the 1970 baseline. By region, the largest drop was 95% in Latin America and the Caribbean, followed by 80% in Africa, 49% in the Asia-Pacific region, 28% in North America, and 23% in Europe and Central Asia.

The report states that the most frequently cited threat to monitored wildlife populations is 'habitat loss and degradation,' followed by overexploitation, climate change, pollution, invasive species, and diseases. It is noted that these threats, in turn, are caused by broader systemic failures in the food, energy, and finance sectors.

Despite the overall negative trend driven by the scale of decline, the LPR emphasized that half of the populations included in the Index are in a 'stable or growing' state. The recovery of green turtles, blue tuna, tigers, and southern African elephants was noted, demonstrating the effectiveness of targeted conservation measures.

When asked about the most important finding of the LPR indicating the growth of species in India, including tigers, Asiatic lions, common leopards, and snow leopards, Sejal Bora, Director of the WWF-India program, stated that the key message is that the country is capable of reversing the fate of wildlife populations with the right combination of factors, including political will, necessary financial resources, civil society participation, and interaction with local communities. She added that India has demonstrated the ability to restore wildlife.

However, during the presentation before the release, WWF-India highlighted certain significant changes in India's biodiversity. The organization noted that approximately 135 species of bats inhabit the country, which suffer from a lack of research and are threatened by urbanization, deforestation, land-use changes, and climate change. It was also mentioned that freshwater fish are among the most vulnerable vertebrates.

Similar stories

Study indicates that deep-sea mining may cause more harm than good to investing countries
Read more
noticiasaominuto.com

Study indicates that deep-sea mining may cause more harm than good to investing countries

A recently released study concluded that exploiting resources in deep waters could result in substantial financial losses for the nations investing in this sector, rather than generating profits. The findings were obtained after subjecting the economic projections of the mining industry itself to a rigorous stress test.

The analysis demonstrated that in more than eight out of ten considered realistic scenarios (83%), deep-sea mining ends up destroying value, even without considering environmental costs or other social effects. Furthermore, there is a 61% probability that investors will not be able to recover the capital they invested.

The work, titled 'Case Not Proven: The Economics of Deep-Sea Mining', was supported by several organizations focused on biodiversity and ocean conservation, including the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition (DSCC), Oceans North, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Dona Bertarelli Philanthropy, and the Blue Ocean Foundation.

In contrast to estimates from The Metals Company (TMC), which suggest gains in the billions of dollars, the test conducted by this analysis resulted in an average loss of $5 billion, as indicated in a joint statement by the Blue Ocean Foundation and the DSCC.

Johnny West, author of the study and director of Koinon Consulting, a German consultancy specializing in finance, stated in the release that 'deep-sea mining does not present itself as an attractive investment. The returns are too low for the technical, operational, environmental, price, demand, and social acceptance risks involved.'

The warning issued in the statement extends beyond exploration companies, indicating that the activity could decrease public revenues from terrestrial mining due to the 'effect of depressing global metal prices with the entry of new supply into the market.'

Governments could face annual losses between $1.1 and $1.19 billion at peak production, and sponsoring states would be subject to 'significant legal and environmental risks,' according to the statement.

Pradeep Singh, an oceanic governance expert at the Blue Ocean Foundation, reinforced the conclusion, stating that 'this independent report confirms what many experts and academics suspected: the narrative about the economic benefits promised by deep-sea mining is a myth.'

The authors of the analysis emphasize that the study does not include potential costs resulting from environmental damage, nor the broader impacts on fishing, livelihoods, and marine ecosystems, factors that would further worsen the economic balance.

Popular