Economists point to several challenges for the next government, besides balancing public accounts
Read more
Grupo Globo
g1.globo.com

Economists point to several challenges for the next government, besides balancing public accounts

When questioning more than twenty economists from various schools of thought about the main economic challenge for the future government, g1 identified the balance of public accounts as the most relevant topic.

Concern over fiscal health is a consensus among experts. This problem initially manifests in the primary balance—the difference between government revenues and expenditures—and culminates in the increase of public debt.

Currently, Brazil's gross debt reached its highest level since April 2021, the period of the Covid-19 pandemic. In August of this year, public sector indebtedness, which includes the federal government, Social Security, states, and municipalities, reached R$ 11.05 trillion.

This indicator is rising and corresponds to 82.9% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), meaning that the debt is equivalent to approximately ten months of the Brazilian economy's total production.

In this context, a solid adjustment in public accounts is seen as the basis for any plan to revitalize the national economy. The expectation is that a more stable debt trajectory can reduce pressure on interest rates and inflation, creating an environment conducive to greater consumption, investment, and growth.

The logic of current risk is clear: when the government spends persistently more than it collects, it needs to take on more debt. The higher the debt and the greater the uncertainty about its sustainability, the greater the investors' distrust. Consequently, the government has to pay higher interest rates to finance itself, which can raise inflation and keep the basic interest rate, Selic, at high levels, making credit more expensive for companies and families, resulting in slower growth.

View of Maílson da Nóbrega, former Finance Minister

Maílson da Nóbrega, former Finance Minister, emphasizes that the elected president must quickly present concrete adjustment measures, either by defining areas of attack or detailing planned actions. He warns that the absence of these measures until the beginning of the mandate could cause a collapse of expectations and macroeconomic deterioration, manifested by the rise of the dollar, the increase in future interest rates, and the restriction of bank credit.

Among the challenges pointed out are: increasing productivity through more qualified labor and more efficient companies; reducing the weight of family and business debt in a high-interest rate scenario; implementing reforms and improving the business environment, such as tax reform; adapting the Brazilian economy to geopolitical tensions, maintaining strategic ties with the United States and China; and creating conditions to attract infrastructure investments without harming fiscal adjustment.

Adriana Dupita, an emerging markets economist at Bloomberg Economics, points out that, unlike other periods, there are no obvious solutions because a drastic cut in spending would not work. She explains that mandatory expenses represent more than 90% of total spending, half of which is linked to the minimum wage. Building social, legislative, and judicial support for reforms that reduce these costs will be difficult, given the country's inequality. Furthermore, she mentions that debt, climate risks, population aging, and the need to plan the impact of artificial intelligence will require new ideas and more public resources.

Perspectives of Alex Agostini, Chief Economist at Austin Rating

For Alex Agostini, the primary challenge for the next president will be stabilizing public accounts until 2030, resuming government surpluses, and decreasing the proportion of public debt relative to GDP. He also highlights the importance of maintaining a well-balanced diplomatic and external relationship, especially after recent disputes between Brazil and the United States. Agostini stresses that this challenge applies to any candidate, regardless of political affiliation.

He observes that the US has interests in critical minerals and rare earths, but such issues depend on Congress. Furthermore, he raises the question of how external relations with China, Brazil's main trading partner, will be. Finally, Agostini warns that another major obstacle will be preventing the economy from losing momentum and entering a recession, thereby worsening household debt.

Analysis by Alexandre Pires, Professor at Ibmec SP

Alexandre Pires assesses that although the fiscal issue persists across different administrations, public accounts will reach 2026 in a condition that will demand unprecedented fiscal effort. He recalls that high public debt pressures the Selic rate, forcing the Central Bank to adopt a more restrictive stance to control inflation.

According to Pires, Brazilian growth will stop depending on the increase in the economically active population and will start depending on investments. However, high interest rates make investment in capital and productivity unattractive, which has led Brazil to register a gradual slowdown in growth, falling below the global average in recent years.

Opinion of Alexandre Schwartsman, former Central Bank Director

Alexandre Schwartsman considers the challenges numerous but places public accounts as the most urgent issue. For him, it is necessary to implement a set of measures that can slow down the increase in public spending in the coming years. This would allow the federal government to resume positive primary balances, thus reversing the trend of public debt growth.

André Galhardo, chief economist at Análise Econômica, adds that, besides organizing finances, the country needs to advance in already initiated reforms, such as the tax reform. He argues that simplification must lead to making the tax system more progressive, providing support to low-income families, businesses with fewer resources, and, above all, small and medium-sized enterprises.

Galhardo also advocates for a broad process of debureaucratization to improve the business environment, combined with a gradual fiscal adjustment. He argues that any abrupt shock could trigger a recession, repeating difficulties seen between 2015 and 2019, making it more prudent to improve the environment than to seek account control at any cost.

André Perfeito, chief economist at Garantia Capital, notes that the current situation is positive, given that unemployment remains low despite high interest rates. He explains that the drop in unemployment raises wages, increasing demand, but also increases the production cost for companies. This scenario creates a dilemma: should companies invest to meet demand or invest in productivity to cut costs? However, with high interest rates, both options are difficult, and the prospect of high interest rates reduces profits. The big challenge, according to Perfeito, is to reduce interest rates while the labor market remains strong, a phenomenon linked to changes in the labor market, where people can easily become drivers or delivery people via applications.

André Roncaglia, executive director of Brazil at the IMF and adjunct professor at UnB, points out that the main challenge is managing high household and corporate debt without compromising economic growth. He recognizes Brazil's recent economic resilience but observes that this resilience came with credit expansion and increased debt in high-cost sectors. In his analysis, future growth will tend to depend less on credit and more on productivity gains, investments, and structural reforms.

Similar stories

Economists warn that the elected president will face economic challenges, with high interest rates being the main obstacle
Read more
g1.globo.com

Economists warn that the elected president will face economic challenges, with high interest rates being the main obstacle

The president elected for the 2027 to 2030 term will find the country with its lowest unemployment rate in history and a consistently positive trade balance. However, experts indicate that the economic scenario will be adverse, characterized by deceleration amidst high interest rates.

Other obstacles to national development include low economic productivity, international instability, high household debt, and inflation projections exceeding the established target.

In conversation with experts, the g1 portal sought to understand what actions the next president can take to improve the country's economic environment.

Need for political pacification

Economist Zeina Latif, managing partner of Gibraltar Consulting and professor at Insper, argues that economic evolution fundamentally depends on an improvement in the political landscape. She emphasizes the need for a 'pacification of the country' to establish a base of support in Congress, which would strengthen the capacity to implement the economic agenda of the future occupant of the Palácio do Planalto.

Latif stresses that this step is crucial for generating confidence among economic agents, stating: 'I think the first thing, before talking directly about the economy, is the background that needs to be built towards pacifying the country, towards creating an allied base with participation in the government, and obviously, as a way to also bring confidence from economic agents. This step is very important.'

Interest rate reduction

Experts agree that the main impediment for the future president will be the high level of the country's interest rate, which has restricted economic growth, fostering default and population indebtedness.

Although the basic rate of the economy is currently at 13.75% per year, having reached 15% annually, it remains among the highest globally in real terms. The Central Bank maintains this high rate with the aim of controlling inflationary pressures and directing inflation toward the 3% target. To enable lower interest rates, analysts suggest rebalancing public finances, which implies not only resuming positive balances—something that has not occurred sustainably since 2014—but also implementing growing surpluses to mitigate the increase in public debt.

The main presidential candidates show awareness of this problem, citing the high interest rate as an obstacle to sustainable growth in their government plans. However, they do not specify how they intend to achieve the rebalancing of public accounts.

Felipe Salto, chief economist and partner at Warren Investimentos and former executive director of the Independent Fiscal Institution (IFI) of the Federal Senate, believes that the central challenge against deceleration is the recovery of primary surpluses, meaning positive balances in government accounts. He argues that this adjustment cannot be a 'shock,' but rather a long-term recovery program, whose results must be visible from the beginning, and should be proposed by the president and approved by Congress for immediate implementation.

Salto proposes discussing issues such as linkages, indexations, tax and financial subsidies, super-salaries, parliamentary amendments, military pension, and other items. Despite this, the economist points out that high popular indebtedness is not solely the responsibility of the basic interest rate, citing high 'bank spreads,' meaning final rates charged by banks much higher than the Selic rate, and advocating for the reduction of these values.

Flávio Ataliba, researcher at the Brazilian Institute of Economics of the Getúlio Vargas Foundation (FGV Ibre), observed that the current structure of public accounts (fiscal framework) still fails to dissipate uncertainties about the trajectory of these accounts. For him, the lack of a clear signal on how the country will stabilize its debt raises investors' risk perception, contributing to keeping interest rates high.

Ataliba states that a credible fiscal rule would allow for the sustainable reduction of interest rates, alleviate household debt, and create conditions to increase productivity. He concludes: 'Today there is no credible predictability that we will have a rule capable of stabilizing the debt. This generates a very large risk premium in the economy.'

Zeina Latif advocates for measures that signal commitment to public accounts to lower interest rates, even if the adjustment does not ensure the stabilization of Brazilian debt in the coming years. She supports reforms, many of which are constitutional, aimed at reducing mandatory spending. According to her, 'showing this commitment would already help to disinflate, so to speak, the economy, meaning reducing inflation expectations, reducing exchange rate volatility, reducing interest rates. So this fiscal issue is central as a foundation for macroeconomic stability.'

Unemployment and productivity

With the Brazilian economy decelerating, Flávio Ataliba, from FGV Ibre, predicted that the labor market will tend to show 'more significant effects' (loss of dynamism) throughout 2027.

Besides short-term problems, the economist highlights low productivity as a structural challenge of the Brazilian economy. He argues that a real increase in income is only achievable through productivity growth, because without it, it becomes difficult to meet the population's needs and sustain growth.

Felipe Salto agrees that unemployment may increase at some point, but believes that the turbulent period of 2027 can be overcome through the rebalancing of public accounts, including measures already adopted by the current government, such as limiting the growth of the minimum wage to the ceiling of the framework, in addition to advancing the fiscal agenda.

Zeina Latif points out that the core of the Brazilian issue lies in increasing labor force productivity and, concurrently, wages, which would also help reduce household debt. She concludes by saying: 'I think we need to rethink these consumption stimulus measures. It would be healthier for consumption to accelerate due to reforms, due to a more favorable macroeconomic environment, due to productivity gains translating into wages. That is the healthiest way, and not artificial stimuli that, later on, end up generating this financial stress for families.'

Trade policy

In the scope of international trade policy, which faces tensions due to the Middle East war—affecting the buying and selling of Brazilian products—and the tariff protectionism imposed by US President Donald Trump, economists suggest that expanding exports and opening the economy can boost investment, productivity, and long-term growth.

Salto emphasizes that, in a context of conflicts and tariffs, the challenge is to maintain the guidelines of 'ensuring Brazil's seat at negotiation tables with major economies and amplifying our historical plural and aggregating position.' He adds that growth will only return with a significant expansion of net exports, recovering the relevance of industry in light of new environmental, energy, and technological agendas.

Zeina Latif advocates for the reformulation of Mercosur, a bloc composed of Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay, to grant greater flexibility in concluding trade agreements. Currently, the rules require that agreements be negotiated jointly by the bloc, not individually by a country.

Latif criticizes non-tariff barriers, mentioning discussions about double taxation and distortions, which create a 'mosaic' of rules, resulting in more bureaucracy, uncertainty, and complexity without general coherence. She concludes that Brazil is very outdated in this aspect and that, despite some agreements advancing, it would be vital to accelerate the diversification of trade partners given global risks.

Popular