In India, players can resemble Bradman if the pitch does not favor spin or swing
Read more
Aaj Tak
www.aajtak.in

In India, players can resemble Bradman if the pitch does not favor spin or swing

Following the match in Guwahati, debates continue over whether it was a day for great batsmen or an open rebellion of the pitch against the bowlers. Although the West Indies scored an impressive 405 runs, India managed to overcome this barrier, as if the goal was merely a formality, winning by a margin of 39 wickets with eight dismissals, in just 43.3 overs.

This record total of 811 runs raises an important question: was it a result of the batsmen's genius or the unfavorable conditions on the field for the bowlers?

The highest score by the West Indies in ODI history was 405/7, but in Guwahati, this figure proved insufficient to secure a win in defense.

Shubman Gill and Rohit Sharma provided the answer. Gill scored 233 not out off 133 balls, which included 26 fours and 8 sixes, making him the fastest double centurion in ODIs. Rohit added 101 runs off 75 balls, including 10 fours and 6 sixes. Together, these two scored 255 runs for the first wicket, dismantling the West Indies attack.

Despite the obvious skill of Gill and Rohit, the match picture cannot be described solely by batting skills; the condition of the pitch must also be considered. In Guwahati, the ball did not receive much assistance from the air. Seam movement was absent, and the bounce that could have caused discomfort to the batsman was also not observed. The ball came to the batsman, and he played it as he wished. Under such conditions, the cost of error for the bowler increases, and the opportunities for the batsman to attack expand.

It would be easy to call the match with a total of 811 simply an ODI celebration, but India's head coach, Gautam Gambhir, saw in this bright picture the helplessness of the bowlers. Discussing the match with the broadcaster after winning the series, Gambhir stated that there should be more confrontation between bat and ball. He emphasized: 'This is not cricket, it is only baseball' (a literal translation of the phrase, implying the dominance of one element).

Citing young bowlers as an example, Gambhir noted what a young bowler can do on such a pitch when the opponent scores 400 runs, and then his own team is also chasing 400? From the perspective of records, spectators, and broadcasters, the match may seem magnificent, but as a fan and a coach, sympathy should be shown to the bowlers.

This observation takes the entire match beyond a mere 'run fest.' For the batsmen, it might be paradise, but in cricket, the bowler exists not only to fulfill statistics. He needs something from the air, something from the pitch, or some slight unpredictability in the bounce so that the batsman is forced to reconsider his technique—that is what the clash of bat and ball is. When all these factors disappear due to the pitch condition, the task remains solely before the batsman, and Gill and Rohit fulfilled it. Under such circumstances, any world top batsman can temporarily look like the embodiment of Bradman.

The mention of Bradman here is not to define anyone's greatness, but to explain the imbalance where the batsman has numerous options and the bowler has a limited arsenal.

In ODI cricket, 400 runs used to be considered an exceptional achievement. In Guwahati, both teams exceeded this threshold. The difference is that the West Indies stopped at 405, while India went further, reaching 406, leaving 39 wickets.

This does not mean that every score above 400 is due to the pitch, or that every big batting innings is a gift from the dismissed player. In the innings of Gill (233) and Rohit (101), their skills, aggression, and shot selection were also involved. However, when both teams cross the 400 mark in one match, the natural question arises about the role of the pitch.

Gambhir raised exactly this question: records are needed, but not at the expense of the confrontation itself. India won the series 2-0. Gill etched his name into the record books, Rohit left his mark as the seventh, and the chase for 406 runs entered history. But the true discussion of Guwahati goes beyond the scoreboard. In cricket, the batsman must have a chance to score runs, but the bowler must also have a chance to take a wicket. Otherwise, the mountain of 400 runs will turn into a sand dune on a pitch that favors spin.

Similar stories

Second ODI between India and West Indies: Focus on Indian fast bowlers and Virat Kohli's form
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Second ODI between India and West Indies: Focus on Indian fast bowlers and Virat Kohli's form

Despite having a star-studded batting lineup, the main focus in the upcoming second ODI against the West Indies will be on the Indian fast bowlers. In the first match, the performances of Virat Kohli and Shubman Gill, who scored 296 runs, were insignificant, but the absence of Jasprit Bumrah and Hardik Pandya cast doubt on the fast bowling attack.

This match will take place in Guwahati at 14:00. In the first ODI played in Tiruvannamalai, India achieved its goal in less than 42 overs. Gill captained the side, Kohli scored in his characteristic style, and Kuldeep Yadav took four wickets, demonstrating his skill with the ball.

However, the picture regarding the fast bowlers was not entirely clear. Due to preparations for the upcoming World Cup next year, India introduced Nitish Kumar Reddy and rested Mohammed Siraj. This experiment did not meet expectations; Reddy, returning from injury, struggled for rhythm and lost 18 runs in his seven-ball over.

The main question now is whether India will give Reddy another chance with the new ball or bring back Mohammed Siraj. Jasprit Bumrah is in Japan for the Asian Games, and Hardik Pandya awaits fitness clearance. Thus, the squad for the second ODI could be significant in terms of World Cup preparation.

There might be an opening for the Jammu and Kashmir pacer, Akib Nabi. Although Nabi was included in the Indian team for the Test series against Sri Lanka, he has yet to make his international debut. India constantly looks for players who can contribute with both bat and ball. It was with this thought that Naman Dhir was included in the first ODI.

Dhir scored 33 runs in five overs but did not get a chance to bat. If Siraj returns, one of the all-round options will have to be dropped. Furthermore, including Nabi would require a complete reassessment of the team balance with an additional specialist bowler.

Regarding the batting, the most significant news for India is Virat Kohli's form. In the first ODI, Kohli looked completely in control, scoring a hundred runs off just 74 balls, making him the second Indian player after Sachin Tendulkar, who scored 15,000 runs in ODI cricket.

Kohli is now returning to the Baraspara stadium, where he scored his 45th century against Sri Lanka in January 2023. His current form heightens the tension for the second ODI. The only question is whether the West Indies bowlers can stop the Kohli-Gill duo this time.

For the West Indies, this match is a 'fight or die' situation, as they need a win to remain in the series. Their fielding also disappointed in the first ODI. Gill received early assistance and capitalized on it by scoring a hundred.

Coach Darren Sammy's team will attempt to end the long wait against India. The West Indies last won an ODI series against India in 2002. Therefore, the second ODI will feature a combination of Kohli's hot streak and close attention to the composition of the Indian fast bowling attack.

The Indian squad includes: Shubman Gill (captain), Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli, Rituraj Gaikwad, K.L. Rahul (vice-captain), Dhruv Jurel, Nitish Kumar Reddy, Ravindra Jadeja, Kuldeep Yadav, Prasidh Krishna, Gurnoor Batra, Mohammed Siraj, Akib Nabi, Yashasvi Jaiswal, Naman Dhir.

Captain Shreyas Iyer clashed with the umpire during India vs Japan match
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Captain Shreyas Iyer clashed with the umpire during India vs Japan match

The T20 match between India and Japan in Sano turned out to be much more exciting than expected. Due to rain, the game was shortened to five overs, and India, batting first, scored only 32 runs.

After this, the Japanese team managed to create serious problems for the Indians, and the match went down to the final over. It was in this decisive moment that a tense drama unfolded, leaving everyone in attendance holding their breath.

The situation reached its peak tension in the final over. Japan needed only a few runs to win, and the pressure on the field was immense. Akshar Patel was bowling when umpire Chris Thorpe ruled that one of Akshar's balls was a wide.

The series of wides was already causing difficulties for the Indian team, and the umpire's decision caused strong disappointment for bowler Akshar Patel. However, the situation did not end there. Indian captain Shreyas Iyer lost his composure and immediately walked towards the umpire.

It was evident from the broadcast how angry Iyer was about the decision, and he expressed his dissatisfaction in a very aggressive manner. At such a critical moment in the game, awarding an extra run could have been fatal for India, and Iyer's anger was caused by this.

Considering the anger of the Indian team's captain and the pressure from the players, field umpires Chris Thorpe and Chris Brown held a discussion. Following this, a dramatic turn occurred: the umpires changed their initial decision and ruled the ball as valid. This review fundamentally changed the course of the match.

In this thrilling game, the Indian team maintained psychological resilience after the drama and managed to stop the runs scored in the last balls, thereby preventing Japan from winning. Ultimately, India won this intense confrontation by a margin of two runs. In the five-over match, India scored 32/4, while the Japanese team managed only 30/3.

Popular