The Territorial Department of the Competition Committee of the Republic of Karakalpakstan reported the detection of signs of coordinated actions and anti-competitive agreements in 200 tenders conducted in Karakalpakstan.
Inspections carried out from January to June 2026 covered 345 tenders with a total value of approximately 41 billion soms. As a result of the inspection, 842 violations of competition legislation were discovered in 317 public procurements worth 32.1 billion soms.
Separately, specialists studied 200 tenders that were conducted through the electronic platform etender.uzex.uz in 2025. These procurements concerned services for laboratory testing of the quality of construction materials used in road construction and related works, as well as the preparation of corresponding protocols and reports.
The cumulative initial value of these tenders exceeded 1.6 billion soms. After analysis, a Special Commission established the presence of signs of coordinated actions and anti-competitive arrangements on the part of the customer and several commercial entities.
According to the inspection results, tender participants distributed orders among themselves based on territorial principles. It was noted that certain companies regularly participated in the same procurements, after which one of the participants systematically became the winner.
Furthermore, identical and synchronized approaches were used when preparing price proposals. In some cases, laboratory testing protocols were prepared even before the tenders took place, and corresponding contracts were concluded.
The inspection also found instances where invoices confirming the full completion of contractual work were issued on the day of contract registration with the Treasury or the next day.
The Special Commission concluded that the customer's actions violate Article 29 of the Law 'On Competition,' which prohibits any actions that restrict or are capable of restricting competition in tenders. In response to the identified facts, an order was issued requiring the elimination of violations and preventing similar situations in the future.
Reports on administrative offenses were compiled regarding officials responsible for the violations of competition legislation. These documents were submitted to the judicial authorities according to established procedures.



