An editorial article published by Kayhan examines gasoline prices in the United States and potential fuel issues that could arise after the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Although Iran's nuclear issue has always been of great importance to the US, currently, American citizens are directly affected by the prices of gasoline and diesel fuel at gas stations in the US.
It is reported that discussions held by the Trump administration concerned the cancellation of fuel taxes, the exemption of agricultural diesel fuel from taxes, and even Vice President J.D. Vance's proposal to ban diesel fuel exports. These steps are seen as signs of serious tension in the American economy. The article's author argues that the fact that even European countries are reducing fuel taxes to prevent social unrest underscores the significance of Iran's influence on global energy markets.
Consequently, Kayhan believes that Iran should not easily relinquish its influence over the Strait of Hormuz. According to the publication, the way to restrain the White House is not through diplomatic gestures or preemptive offers, but through reducing trade and transit through this strait.
Iran: Results of the Trip to New York Will Be Clearer Later
In an analysis of President Masoud Pezeshkian's visit to New York, the Iranian newspaper noted that this trip has an important domestic dimension. The president's participation in the world's most significant diplomatic forum occurs during a period when Iranian society is closely monitoring regional events, as well as economic and political pressure, awaiting tangible results from the government's diplomatic efforts.
According to international relations analyst Sabah Zangeneh, assessing the success of this trip will require observing the development of foreign policy over the next three months. Key factors include the impact of political changes in the United States and Israel on Donald Trump's and Benjamin Netanyahu's opponents, a possible change in governments' attitudes towards Iran, and whether military attacks and pressure on Iran will continue, or if a more rational approach may emerge, especially from the United States.
Resalat: Iran Holds the Initiative
In an article dedicated to America's difficulties in the region and the ongoing confrontation with Iran, the publication Resalat asserted that the central issue is no longer simply accepting or rejecting a diplomatic offer. Instead, it is a struggle of wills, in which the Islamic Republic seeks to strengthen its position through a strategy of 'active resistance' and a combination of diplomacy with military influence.
The newspaper states that Washington intends to weaken Iran's defense capabilities and geopolitical influence through maritime pressure and economic sanctions before offering any concessions in the sanctions regime. However, Resalat argues that Tehran, having learned from America's past actions, has changed the strategic equation. According to Resalat, the current dispute over the Persian Gulf and the strategic Strait of Hormuz is only a visible part of a much larger struggle to preserve Iran's strategic influence against imperialist ambitions.
Ham-Mihan: Welcoming China's Four-Point Plan
The publication Ham-Mihan reviewed China's four-point proposal and Beijing's role in regional processes. Quoting international relations analyst Mohsen Pak Ain, it stated that China, as a major global power, is capable of playing a constructive role in resolving regional problems. Pak Ain noted that Iran welcomes China's initiative because its four points largely reflect Iranian positions expressed through Chinese diplomatic language.
The plan emphasizes ending the conflict, regional cooperation for mutual security, prioritizing the Palestinian issue in the Middle East, and adhering to international law. He stated that Iran supports a regional security system without external interference and believes that neighboring countries should cooperate directly with each other. While welcoming China's participation, he also argued that the United States still lacks the necessary political will to resolve these issues, seeking instead to benefit without any concessions. In his words, Iran recognizes this approach and acts in accordance with its national interests.
Etemad: Why Iran Should Improve Relations with Saudi Arabia
In an analysis of Iran's policy towards Saudi Arabia, the publication Etemad argued that current global and regional realities have prompted Iran to avoid confrontation with neighboring states, especially Saudi Arabia, and instead focus on areas of common interest. The newspaper reported that strengthening regional ties, preventing the emergence of an Arab-Israeli alliance and further development of the Abraham Accords, utilizing Iran's influence in the Islamic world, deterring excessive rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and Israel, expanding ties with Persian Gulf neighbors to mitigate the effects of sanctions, and ensuring a role in the post-conflict security structure of the region require improving relations with Riyadh.
According to Etemad, despite existing disagreements, expanding contacts with Saudi Arabia is critically important, as stronger ties with Riyadh are seen as the key to broader engagement with countries in the region.